Not out of the Woods

By Chote, Robert | The Independent (London, England), September 28, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Not out of the Woods


Chote, Robert, The Independent (London, England)


BUREAUCRACIES are by their nature unlovable. The 50th birthday of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund is proving as much an occasion for critical scrutiny as for a celebration of their longevity.

The IMF and the World Bank were spawned in 1944 by the Bretton Woods monetary conference, at which the representatives of 44 countries met in a New Hampshire hotel and laid out a blueprint for the post-war international economic order. But the economic environment has changed out of all recognition since then, forcing the Bretton Woods institutions to evolve in ways that their founders could not have anticipated.

The IMF was created to police a system of fixed but adjustable exchange rates, averting pressures for protectionism by providing short- term loans to countries with balance of payments difficulties. But the exchange rate regime collapsed in the early 1970s when Richard Nixon floated the US dollar. Since then the IMF has spent more time telling developing countries and those making the transition from communism to capitalism how to run their economies.

"The IMF still has an authoritative voice; through a variety of channels, most significantly the Group of Seven leading industrial nations, it can express views on major policy concerns," argues Bahram Nowzad, former head of the IMF's external finance division. "But in reality the IMF's impact and influence on the policy decisions of major industrial countries is faint, its role emasculated."

This has blurred the distinction between the IMF and World Bank, which was set up to narrow the gap between rich and poor countries through large-scale investment projects, often public sector schemes like dams. Now, like the IMF, the bank helps to fund "structural adjustment" in developing nations, offering loans often with strings attached.

Before their annual meetings, which take place in Madrid next week, the organisations are sponsoring a two-day navel-gazing conference. Critics will not be in short supply. One camp - including campaigning charities like Christian Aid - deplores the prescriptions the IMF and the World Bank apply to the countries they claim to help. It says they damage the economy, exacerbate poverty and harm the environment. Another camp - well represented in the industrial countries that finance the institutions - believes they are bloated and inefficient bureaucracies.

The accusation that the Bretton Woods institutions exacerbate the very problems they aspire to solve is fundamental. Their traditional policy recommendation combines currency devaluation to improve the balance of payments, with tight interest rate and budgetary policy to bear down on inflation and reduce need for credit. The institutions also advocate privatisation to improve economic efficiency. But critics argue that the Asian "tigers" became successful by allowing the state a greater role in creating and protecting fragile new industries.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Not out of the Woods
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?