Law Report: Pergau Dam Aid Unlawful ; Regina V Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ex Parte the World Dev Elopment Movement Ltd, Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Scott Baker). 10 November 1994

By Ying Hui Tan, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), January 11, 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Report: Pergau Dam Aid Unlawful ; Regina V Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ex Parte the World Dev Elopment Movement Ltd, Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Scott Baker). 10 November 1994


Ying Hui Tan, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


Although the Foreign Secretary, when exercising the power under section 1(1) of the Overseas Development and Co-operation Act 1989 to provide financial aid for projects abroad, may take into account political considerations, the power must be exe rcised for the purpose of promoting an economically sound development.

The Divisional Court declared that the Foreign Secretary's decision in July 1991 to provide aid from the British Aid and Trade Provision to fund the Pergau dam project in Malaysia was unlawful.

Section 1(1) of the Overseas Development and Co-operation Act 1980 provides: "The Secretary of State shall have power for the purposes of promoting the development or maintaining the economy of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom, or the welfare of its people, to furnish any person or body with assistance, whether financial, technical or of any other nature."

In 1988, two British companies indicated interest in the Pergau dam project and sought overseas aid from the ATP under section 1 of the 1980 Act. In March 1989 the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, met the Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir Mahatir, in London and made an offer of ATP support for the project, conditional on a full, economic appraisal.

The Overseas Development Administration's appraisal of the project was that it was uneconomic and did not meet criteria for aid funds.

The accounting officer's view was that the project was an abuse of the aid programme because it was uneconomic and not a sound development project.

In July 1991, the Foreign Secretary, against that advice, approved ATP support for the Pergau project on the basis that offers of financial support had already been made and withdrawal of that support would be detrimental to political and commercial relations with Malaysia. The applicant, a non-partisan pressure group concerned with the misuse of aid money, applied for judicial review of the Foreign Secretary's decision on the ground that the power to grant aid under section 1(1) was to be exercised forsound development projects.

Nigel Pleming QC and Owen Davies (Bindman & Partners) for the applicant; Stephen Richards (Treasury Solicitor) for the Foreign Secretary.

LORD JUSTICE ROSE said that the importance of the issue raised, the likely absence of any other responsible challenger and the role of the applicant in giving advice, guidance and assistance, with regard to aid, pointed to the conclusion that the applicant had a sufficient interest in the matter to make the application.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Report: Pergau Dam Aid Unlawful ; Regina V Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ex Parte the World Dev Elopment Movement Ltd, Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Scott Baker). 10 November 1994
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?