Fair Game for a Poacher?
Carter, Meg, The Independent (London, England)
Revenge may be a dish best served cold. It may also be sound business strategy. Certainly it fuelled Maurice Saatchi's new agency, M&C Saatchi, to win back pounds 90m of advertising accounts from his old business, Saatchi & Saatchi Advertising, last year. Still, with the ending this month of the 12-month moratorium banning him from poaching old clients and ex-staff, observers are questioning the merit of resuming hostilities.
"The war is far from over," says Alison Fendley, author of Commercial Break, the Inside Story of Saatchi & Saatchi. "M&C Saatchi executives have made it clear they would return to battle come the new year." Ron Leagas, chairman of the advertising agency Leagas Shafron Davis and a former Saatchi employee, agrees: "The revenge motive is still prevalent." But, he adds: "It's not healthy for long-term business growth."
The war between Maurice Saatchi and Saatchi & Saatchi, the agency he and his brother, Charles, created, is the most public of battles. After Maurice's ousting by institutional investors in December 1994, a number of top Saatchi & Saatchi personnel defected, taking a number of lucrative clients - including Dixons, British Airways, Qantas, the tobacco company Gallaher and the Mirror Group - with them. All were eager to stick with Maurice.
The reasons vary. Friends - such as the bosses at Mars - did not like the way Maurice had been axed. Others were disillusioned with the old Saatchi & Saatchi. "M&C has the magic. Saatchi & Saatchi, without them, does not," says one. Neither Gallaher nor BA will comment on the split, but John Clare, Dixons group chief executive, says: "An advertising agency account is a people business, not a company business. We stuck with people we know."
After a legal wrangle over the use of the Saatchi name, Maurice and Charles named their new business M&C Saatchi; the old Saatchi & Saatchi Worldwide group became Cordiant (the London agency remains Saatchi & Saatchi Advertising). M&C has since won new business, including Sekonda, Head, Courage and Glaxo. By the end of 1995 the company was claiming billings worth pounds 300m and - the icing on the cake - the Tory party …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Fair Game for a Poacher?. Contributors: Carter, Meg - Author. Newspaper title: The Independent (London, England). Publication date: January 9, 1996. Page number: 16,17. © 2009 The Independent - London. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.