Law Report: Procedure on Pre-Trial Hearings in Camera Ex Parte Guardian Newspapers Ltd Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Brooke, Mr Justice Kay and Mr Justice Maurice Kay) 30 September 1998

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), October 8, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Report: Procedure on Pre-Trial Hearings in Camera Ex Parte Guardian Newspapers Ltd Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Brooke, Mr Justice Kay and Mr Justice Maurice Kay) 30 September 1998


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


AN ORDER that a pre-trial application to stay criminal proceedings as an abuse of the process of the court be heard in camera was an order within Rule 24A of the Crown Court Rules 1982, and notice should accordingly be given of an application for such an order.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of Guardian Newspapers Ltd under section 159(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 against an order made by Collins J at the Central Criminal Court that the part of the criminal proceedings before him concerning the defendants' application to stay the proceedings as an abuse of process be held in camera.

Notices were served on the Crown Court under Rule 24A of the Crown Court Rules 1982 indicating an intention to apply for an order that part of the proceedings in question be heard in camera. The notices failed to state whether national security or the protection of the identity of a witness was the reason for the application, and failed to specify to which part or parts of the proceedings the notice related. Guardian Newspapers Ltd unsuccessfully opposed the making of the order, and subsequently served a notice on the Registrar of Criminal Appeals seeking leave to appeal under section 159(1)(b) of the 1988 Act. Michael Tugendhat QC (Siobhain Butterworth) for the Guardian; Robert Boyle (Serious Fraud Office) for the Crown; Alun Jones QC and James Wood (Simons Muirhead & Burton) for the first defendant; Edmund Lawson QC and Mukul Chawla (Kingsley Napley) for the second defendant. Lord Justice Brooke said that it fell to the court to decide for the first time whether the reference to "an order that all or part of a trial be heard in camera" in Rule 24A(1) was apt to refer to an order that a pre-trial application to stay proceedings for abuse of process be heard in camera. If the rule did not apply, then there were no rules of court to require any public notice of such an application, nor to regulate the carriage of an appeal which undoubtedly lay pursuant to section 159(1)(b) of the 1988 Act.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Report: Procedure on Pre-Trial Hearings in Camera Ex Parte Guardian Newspapers Ltd Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Brooke, Mr Justice Kay and Mr Justice Maurice Kay) 30 September 1998
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?