Is It Time to Jump off the European Express?

By Hogg, Sarah | The Independent (London, England), February 28, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Is It Time to Jump off the European Express?


Hogg, Sarah, The Independent (London, England)


BRITAIN IN Europe's embarrassment from the over-spinning of research was bad enough. Then came the Prime Minister's speech in Ghent, an attempt to reinvent Thatcherism as a kind of muscular Europhilia, and some misguided interventions by big business beasts. This surge of activity has missed its mark. By raising the spectre of exit from the EU, it has actually left more people in an increasingly sceptical country wondering whether this is not the only real alternative to EMU.

Time to go back to what the National Institute, and others', research actually says, for a reality check on arguments for three states of economic life: in the EU, in Euroland, and outside both altogether. The integrationists' argument is stiff with train metaphors. We are on a journey. The longer we are in the European Union, the more integrated we become. Disembarking becomes more unthinkable, while the EMU express becomes more attractive. It's always the same, they say, at each station on our Euroroute. Disdain, obstruction, then grudging application too late to have a say on the ticket price.

Well, the National Institute makes clear that we have indeed been travelling. Over 40 years, our export focus has shifted steadily towards Europe. Other recent work, by Michael Artis, (see table), shows we are still less EU-centric than some countries, but not off the map. Intra-EU trade today makes up a higher proportion of Britain's national income than of Germany's, for example.

Some 2.7 million British people, according to the National Institute, are producing goods and services sold in the rest of the European Union, with perhaps another half-million working for firms which might not exist if European markets were closed. But - and this is where the row began - it is of course nonsense to suppose those jobs would simply be lost if we left the EU.

Put crudely, either we would continue to sell the same goods and services into the rest of the EU for less money, absorbing the cost of trade barriers. Or we would divert these resources to other production, from which - assuming we currently deploy these efficiently - we would also earn less. So the main effect is on income, not employment, which explains the National Institute's extreme irritation with the spin-doctors. After building in the impact of reclaiming our budget contribution, detaching from the CAP, and adjusting monetary policy to smooth the transition, the National Institute's conclusion is that employment would recover - but the value of UK output would be about two percentage points lower (nearly pounds 20bn, in today's money) if we left the EU.

Such analysis cannot tell us what our economic growth would be, since this depends on all sorts of other factors. What it can do, however, is to highlight the sensitivity of these estimates to two variables: the height of EU trade barriers, and the pull of membership on direct investment.

Even as we have been becoming more integrated, the walls of fortress Europe have been coming down. In that sense, membership has become less valuable. But not much less, because these barriers are still relatively high compared with other trading blocks: an average tariff of 7.7 per cent, weighted by production, in the late 1990s, compared with 5.2 per cent in the United States and 3.4 per cent in Japan. Allowing for our mix of exports, and for non-tariff barriers, the National Institute reckons Britain's exit would add 8.7 per cent to the cost of exporting to the EU. (And that assumes we were not subjected to extra obstruction on departure, pour encourager les autres.)

Painful - although, to put it in context, less than the cost pressure British exporters have felt from the past year's sterling appreciation against the euro.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Is It Time to Jump off the European Express?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?