Tuesday Law Report: Listing Practice of Mental Health Review Tribunals Was Unlawful ; 10 July 2001 R (on the Application of C) V Mental Health Review Tribunal Court of Appeal (Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Jonathan Parker and Lord Mustill) 3 July

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), July 1, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Tuesday Law Report: Listing Practice of Mental Health Review Tribunals Was Unlawful ; 10 July 2001 R (on the Application of C) V Mental Health Review Tribunal Court of Appeal (Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Jonathan Parker and Lord Mustill) 3 July


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


THE PRACTICE of mental health review tribunals of fixing the hearing dates for applications for discharge by patients detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 eight weeks after the date of the application was unlawful.

The Court of Appeal allowed the applicant's appeal against the dismissal of his application for judicial review of the practice of listing cases before a mental health appeal tribunal eight weeks after the application for discharge had been made.

The applicant suffered from schizophrenia, and was compulsorily detained in hospital under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. He applied to a mental health review tribunal for discharge, and was given a hearing date eight weeks from the date of his application.

Whilst there was no statutory provision for a time limit in which applications of patients detained under section 3 had to be heard, there was a policy under which such applications had to be heard within eight weeks. There was, however, a current practice under which applications were routinely fixed for hearing eight weeks after the date of the application.

The applicant applied for judicial review of that practice, on the basis that a delay of eight weeks could not satisfy the requirement in article 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights that proceedings should result in the lawfulness of detention being determined "speedily". He sought a declaration to that effect.

Before the hearing of his application for judicial review, the applicant was discharged from hospital, but the judge decided nonetheless to hear his application because it raised a point of general public importance, and because the point might prove of more than academic interest to the applicant, as there was at least a risk that he might himself again be detained under the 1983 Act in the future.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Tuesday Law Report: Listing Practice of Mental Health Review Tribunals Was Unlawful ; 10 July 2001 R (on the Application of C) V Mental Health Review Tribunal Court of Appeal (Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Jonathan Parker and Lord Mustill) 3 July
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?