Affirmative Action Ruling Rejects Reagan Policies

By Robert Pear, N. Y. T. N. S. | THE JOURNAL RECORD, July 5, 1986 | Go to article overview

Affirmative Action Ruling Rejects Reagan Policies


Robert Pear, N. Y. T. N. S., THE JOURNAL RECORD


WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court's rulings Wednesday on affirmative action amount to a rejection of the policies and arguments t hat the Reagan administration has been advancing for six years in the field of civil rights.

Since President Reagan took office, Justice Department officials have argued that numerical hiring and promotion goals were invalid as a remedy for employment discrimination, and that relief could be awarded only to identified victims of discrimination.

The court explicitly and forcefully rejected that argument in cases involving a New York labor union and the Cleveland Fire Department. Race-conscious remedies, including goals, ""may be appropriate where an employer or a labor union has engaged in persistent or egregious discrimination, or where necessary to dissipate the lingering effects of pervasive discrimination,'' Associate Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote in a passage summarizing the logic of a majority of the court.

The ruling is the latest in a series of defeats suffered by the administration in Supreme Court cases concerned with the essence of Reagan's domestic agenda. The other cases this year involved abortion, voting rights, Social Security disability benefits and the treatment of handicapped infants.

William Bradford Reynolds, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, has denounced race-conscious remedies and numerical goals as ""morally wrong.'' He has led the administration's campaign against consent decrees in which state and local governments agreed to use hiring goals to undo the effects of discrimination against black and Hispanic workers and women.

The court said that an employer and employees could voluntarily adopt broader remedies through a consent decree than a judge might have awarded after a trial.

In practical terms, the new decisions will force the administration to reconsider its all-out assault on hiring goals. Police and fire departments with affirmative action plans designed to correct historic patterns of discrimination can now keep those programs in place with greater confidence that they will not be struck down.

But the administration can plausibly contend that the decision in the New York case applies only to the most blatant instances of race discrimination. Repeatedly since 1964, the court said, the sheet metal workers' union had been ""found guilty'' of discrimination against black and Hispanic workers and the union was twice cited for contempt of court.

The hallmark of the Reagan administration's civil rights policy, as enunciated by the Justice Department in courts throughout the country, has been broad categorical statements about the illegalityof racial preferences and numerical goals.

The court delivered 135 pages of opinions full of nuance and thoughtful distinctions, thus rejecting the broad prohibition urged by the solicitor general of the United States, Charles Fried.

""We have said that race-conscious remedies which are not victim-specific are never permissible,'' Fried explained. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Affirmative Action Ruling Rejects Reagan Policies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.