Supreme Court Decision Shows No Misgivings over Capital Punishment/judges Call Question of Racial Bias 'A Potentially Irrelevant Factor'

By Thomas Wicker, Ny Times | THE JOURNAL RECORD, May 2, 1987 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Supreme Court Decision Shows No Misgivings over Capital Punishment/judges Call Question of Racial Bias 'A Potentially Irrelevant Factor'


Thomas Wicker, Ny Times, THE JOURNAL RECORD


NEW YORK - Is it really a ``potentially irrelevant factor'' - whatever that may mean - that in Georgia from 1973 to 1978 those who murdered white people were 11 times more likely to receive the death penalty than those who killed blacks?

Is is true that American society ``does not reject the death penalty as grossly excessive'' for persons who may have been accomplices in a murder but who did not actually pull the trigger or plunge in the knife?

That's what the Supreme Court has concluded in two death penalty decisions handed down on consecutive days:

- The more important, reached by a 5-4 vote, held that Georgia's capital punishment law was not unconstitutional, even though statistics showed that its effect was racially biased.

- The other, by the same five-justice majority, broadened the circumstances in which courts may order the death penalty even for persons who did not actually commit a murder.

This court thus showed, if there had been any doubt, that a majority of its members have no misgivings, constitutional or otherwise, about capital punishment as administered in the United States today.

Its two recent decisions, taken together, seem likely to expand the discretion the Supreme Court allows state courts in ordering people put to death.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who wrote the decision making it easier to execute persons who did not themselves actually commit a murder, relied heavily on the fact that 37 states have capital punishment laws; but only 11 of them specifically forbid the death penalty for accomplices in crimes where there was a substantial likelihood that someone might be murdered.

This suggests, O'Connor wrote, that society does not reject the death penalty as ``grossly excessive'' for accomplices to murder.

That reasoning suggests that the number of states that legislate in a certain fashion can determine what is or is not constitutional, and that constitutionality itself is dependent on what may be societally acceptable, or at least not considered ``grossly excessive.''

The majority opinion written by Justice Lewis Powell in the Georgia case seemed particularly tortured in its reasoning and callous in its language.

Not only did it dismiss the question of racial bias, as demonstrated in an extensive statistical study by David Baldus of the University of Iowa Law School, as ``a potentially irrelevant factor'' in Georgia's administration of capital punishment.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Supreme Court Decision Shows No Misgivings over Capital Punishment/judges Call Question of Racial Bias 'A Potentially Irrelevant Factor'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?