Bank Trade Securities Ruling Left Intact / by U.S. Supreme Court

By Ap | THE JOURNAL RECORD, October 6, 1987 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Bank Trade Securities Ruling Left Intact / by U.S. Supreme Court


Ap, THE JOURNAL RECORD


The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday left intact lower court rulings allowing certain state-chartered banks to trade securities and keeping in India a lawsuit against Union Carbide Corp. stemming from the 1984 Bhopal disaster.

The high court also allowed Michigan to continue a Sunday ban on car sales. And it set aside a ruling requiring Delta Air Lines to submit to arbitration a dispute growing out of its $860 million merger with Western Air Lines.

In some important labor decisions, the justices agreed to consider broadening the remedy for workers claiming to be victims of racial harassment, but refused to revive the sex-discrimination lawsuit of seven men claiming a female co-worker who dated the boss was unfairly promoted.

State-chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System were permitted to continue trading stocks and bonds when the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal to a lower court ruling by two trade groups.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, in keeping with a recent deregulatory trend, ruled last April that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. didn't violate the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 by permitting such banks to move into the securities business.

The Depression-era law was passed by Congress in response to a wave of bank failures many saw as the result of stock market speculation by the banking industry.

The appeals court said Congress ``clearly intended'' to allow the banks ``to maintain subsidiary or affiliate relationships with securities firms.''

In the case involving Union Carbide, the Supreme Court, without comment, refused to move to the United States a massive lawsuit against the Danbury, Conn., company following the 1984 Bhopal chemical plant disaster that killed more than 2,000 people.

The justices also rejected an Indian government appeal aimed at placing tougher procedural restraints on Union Carbide, owner of the Bhopal plant, when the claims are tried in India.

Thousands of claims filed in the United States against Union Carbide and a suit filed by the government of India were consolidated and assigned to U.S. District Judge John F. Keenan in New York City.

Keenan dismissed the suits on grounds the case should be heard before a more convenient forum in India.

In other cases Monday, the Supreme Court:

- Left intact a Michigan law permitting a ban of car sales on Sundays while allowing other businesses to remain open. The court said, ``. . .We are not going to be tempted to open the floodgates to declare all regulatory legislation of Sunday sales unconstitutional.''

- Told a federal appeals court to review its ruling requiring arbitration for Delta's merger with Western. Two Western unions challenged the agreement, contending it didn't live up to collective bargaining promises.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Bank Trade Securities Ruling Left Intact / by U.S. Supreme Court
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?