Now Good Time to Study War Powers Act Ramifications

By Driskill, Matt | THE JOURNAL RECORD, October 24, 1987 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Now Good Time to Study War Powers Act Ramifications


For students of history, now more than ever might the time to live and study the tensions being created between Congress and the president over the use of the American military in foreign actions and the War Powers Act of 1973.

The Senate voted Tuesday to invoke cloture, a parlimentary procedure to end a filibuster, and renewed its debate over President Reagan's reflagging and protection of 11 Kuwati ships in the Persian Gulf which has been torn by the Iran-Iraq war for the past seven years.

Last Tuesday's 67-28 vote to invoke cloture cleared the way for the Senate to renew debate as to whether the Democratic-controlled Congress should seek to have the War Powers Act invoked or take other steps to limit Reagan's reflagging and naval protection of Kuwaiti oil tankers.

According to later reports, the Senate wants a detailed report from the president on the Persian Gulf policy within 30 days.

The vote came a day after U.S. Navy ships destroyed Iranian military platforms in the Persian Gulf in retaliation for last week's Iranian missile attack on the Sea Isle City, one of the 11 reflagged tankers.

The Senate has debated Reagan's gulf policy since May 17, when an Iraqi missile attack on the Navy frigate Stark killed 37 U.S. sailors, but the lawmakers have been unable to agree on any type of decision. House leaders said that chamber will wait until after the Senate acts before any similar measures are considered in the House.

The resolution on which the filibuster was ended would require a detailed report from the president within 60 days, answering a variety of detailed questions about his policy. Thirty days after that, Congress would be required to act on a resolution expressing some type of view, either positive or negative, on Reagan's policy.

Minority Leader Bob Dole, R-Kan., criticized the Senate because he said, "we've gotten carried away, everybody is looking for their own solution when it may not be needed."

Sen. Daniel Quayle, R-Ind., said, "We all know the War Powers Act is unconstitutional."

That feeling is echoed by Reagan, who, like his predecessors, says the law is unconstitutional because it limits his powers as commander-in-chief and provides for a legislative veto, something in itself the Supreme Court has ruled unconstitutional in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chada (462 U.S., 919, 1983), according to University of Oklahoma Law Professor Harry Tepker.

"I'm of the opinion that there are substantial doubts as to the law's constitutionality," Tepker said. "It contains a legislative veto that says a military action must terminate within a certain amount of time. . .(but) the more fundemental problem is whether Congress can limit the president's powers under Article II," the president's powers as commander-in-chief.

Tepker said the act is designed to act as a "deadbrake," allowing Congress to act without really acting and forcing the president to come forward.

"In support of that," Tepker said, proponents of the act "argue that is what the provision to declare war calls for" under Article I of the constitution which outlines Congress' duties.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Now Good Time to Study War Powers Act Ramifications


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?