Foreign Investment in U.S. May Do More Good Than Harm

By Passell, Peter | THE JOURNAL RECORD, December 22, 1989 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Foreign Investment in U.S. May Do More Good Than Harm


Passell, Peter, THE JOURNAL RECORD


The Japanese are coming! The Japanese are coming! warn assorted congressional Democrats, union leaders and business interests who watch in horror as foreigners - specifically the Japanese - swallow up everything from computer chip makers to the best beaches in Hawaii.

And while the overall impact is still small - Japanese companies own only about 1 percent of the American manufacturing base - they are beginning to make big waves.

One domestic industry, automobiles, has been transformed in a mere half-decade by an influx of Japanese manufacturers and Japanese manufacturing techniques.

Others may follow: In 1987 and 1988 alone, the assets of Japanese-controlled concerns in this country increased by $100 billion.

What critics have not offered, however, is a careful analysis of why anyone should care whether the stockholders of the Fortune 500 carry Japanese passports rather than American, or prefer sushi to sirloin.

Nor are they are likely to find much comfort from the bluntly titled ``Foreign Direct Investment in the United States'' (Institute for International Economics, $11.95), the first cool-eyed assessment of the question.

For while the authors, Edward Graham of Duke University and Paul Krugman of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, are not entirely sanguine about the growing role of foreign investment, they find no evidence that it is harming American interests.

What is more, they argue that Washington regulators already have sufficient power to cope with any plausible threat.

The standard explanation for the recent sharp increase in direct foreign investment is the trade deficit: Americans bought all those Toyotas; foreigners used the proceeds to buy factories in Kentucky and condos in Trump Tower.

Net foreign investment is indeed the mirror image of the American current account deficit. But much of that investment has been indirect, with foreigners parking their unspent dollars in Treasury securities, bank CDs and the stock market.

And as Graham and Krugman point out, surges in direct investment since the mid-1970s do not correlate with increases in the trade deficit.

Direct investment flows actually fell from 1982 to 1985, years in which the trade deficit went through the roof. And while the trade deficit has stabilized since 1986, direct investment has tripled.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Foreign Investment in U.S. May Do More Good Than Harm
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?