Struggle over High-Definition TV Symbol of "Industrial Policy" Woes

By Wicker, Thomas | THE JOURNAL RECORD, May 25, 1990 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Struggle over High-Definition TV Symbol of "Industrial Policy" Woes


Early in April, the Pentagon quietly diverted to other purposes $20 million of $30 million allocated by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to high-definition television.

About two weeks later, not so quietly, the Defense Department assigned Dr. Craig Fields, the director of Darpa, to another defense position.

Still later, Michael Sekora, the physicist who had directed the Defense Intelligence Agency's ``Project Socrates'' - which monitors the advanced technologies of U.S. economic competitors - announced that he had resigned.

He quit to protest reductions in the Bush administration's support for compiling an accurate data base on foreign technologies, with the aim of aiding U.S. high-technology efforts - those of the military and the private sector.

Fields' reassignment was labeled routine by the Pentagon, but in fact resulted from his efforts to direct government funds into research aiding the competitive position of the nation's commerce and industry, as well as improving its military strength.

That approach, called ``industrial policy,'' was symbolized by the commitment of Darpa funds to the development of high-definition television (HDTV).

But ``industrial policy'' is opposed by Richard Darman, director of the Office of Management and Budget, Michael Boskin, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, and John Sununu, President Bush's chief of staff - hence by the Bush administration. Last year Sununu rebuked Robert Mosbacher, the secretary of commerce, for trying to promote HDTV research.

Fields' ouster may have been precipitated by a $4 million Darpa investment in a radiation-resistant substitute for silicon called gallium arsenide, on terms allowing Darpa a share of the financial return.

But the controversy over HDTV, which has many highly placed supporters in industry and Congress, is more typical of the continuing dispute over ``industrial policy.''

HDTV would replace the 525 horizontal lines of current television receivers with 1,000 to 1,250 lines, resulting in a sharper visual image. Apart from its commercial potential for home TV sets, supporters claim important military applications - for example, flat-panel screens for improved information displays in tanks and aircraft.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Struggle over High-Definition TV Symbol of "Industrial Policy" Woes


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?