Lawmakers Doubt Congress Can Agree on Energy Policy

By Schneider, Keith | THE JOURNAL RECORD, March 29, 1991 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Lawmakers Doubt Congress Can Agree on Energy Policy

Schneider, Keith, THE JOURNAL RECORD


By Keith Schneider WASHINGTON - Lawmakers have responded to the Bush administration's national energy strategy with a flurry of competing proposals to raise gasoline taxes, improve automobile mileage, raise energy efficiency in businesses and homes, open sensitive regions to oil exploration, and spend hundreds of millions of dollars for research on conservation and renewable souuces of energy.

At last count, the House Energy and Commerce Committee was reviewing 68 proposals for revamping federal energy policy, and, in the Senate, four main billse of the most influential lawmakers have expressed doubts that Congress will resolve fierce regional, economic and environmental issues and reach a consensus on a final package. The reason: Oil supplies are steady and prices have fallen since the end of the Persian Gulf war.

``At the moment, there are no gasoline lines or brownouts,'' Rep. John D. Dingell, D-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said last month. ``I wonder if we are serious enough about energy to solve the problem at long last.''

Even if a bill emerges, staff experts in both houses say it is likely to take five or six months to reach the House and Senate floors.

The conference to resolve differences between the bills will take more time and, if successful, a final measure may be ready before the election in 1992.

Few members of Congress disagree that there is an energy problem. Low prices discourage domestic oil and gas production, economists say, while also encouraging people to waste energy.

The United States is importing nearly half its oil, accounting for half the $108 billion international trade deficit in 1990, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Most important, higher imports are vulnerable to costly disruptions of supply. Though the Bush administration insists the Persian Gulf war was primarily a response to Saddam Hussein's aggression, few in Congress doubt that it was also prompted by oil.

What nobody in Congress knows is whether the public views the Persian Gulf war as a call to action on energy policy or as the price a nation must periodically pay to preserve its oil-based way of life.

``Regrettably, we were not wise enough 10 years ago to continue the energy security measures enacted after the oil crises of the 1970s,'' said Rep. Leon E. Panetta, chairman of the House Budget Committee, who introduced an energy proposal last month that called for establishing a minimum price for oil. ``Our dependence has tragically resulted in war. How many times do we have to learn this lesson?''

The debate in Congress will be framed by two issues: whether to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a 17.9-million-acre wilderness in Alaska, to oil and gas exploration, and whether to raise fuel mileage standards on automobiles by 40 percent.

The opening of the refuge was proposed on Feb. 20 by the Bush adminstration in its national energy strategy and was included in several congressional bills, including one introduced by Sens. J. Bennett Johnston, D-La., and Malcolm Wallop, R-Wyo., the chairman and ranking minority member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

The president's plan also includes removing obstacles to the constructon of nuclear power plants, reducing restrictions on utilities that generate electricity for the wholesale market and simplifying lng the use of alternative fuels in vehicle fleets.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Lawmakers Doubt Congress Can Agree on Energy Policy


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?