Clinton Plan Draws Praise for Aiding State Fiscal Policy

By Hinds, Michael deCourcy | THE JOURNAL RECORD, February 26, 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Clinton Plan Draws Praise for Aiding State Fiscal Policy


Hinds, Michael deCourcy, THE JOURNAL RECORD


By Michael deCourcy Hinds

N.Y. Times News Service

President Clinton's economic plan is drawing praise from a bipartisan collection of governors and from experts on state fiscal policy, who say that for the first time in years Washington has stopped trying to shift costly programs to the states.

Of two dozen governors who responded to inquiries over the past week, Democrats uniformly approved of the president's plan, and even Republicans who opposed it on the ground that it would increase taxes on income and energy nevertheless welcomed its proposed infusions of federal money.

Gov. Jim Edgar of Illinois, a Republican, applauded Clinton's "infrastructure initiatives to stimulate economic recovery." And Gov. Pete Wilson of California, another Republican, said he found "much to like, much to applaud," including plans to reduce the deficit and reorganize welfare as a two-year job-training program.

The experts in fiscal policy said Clinton's plan would radically change 12 years of Federal-state relations, a period in which the federal government transferred more responsibilities to the states than at any other time in American history, according to the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.

As governor of Arkansas, Clinton spearheaded some of the governors' losing battles over shifting programs to states without paying for them. As a presidential candidate, he complained that the federal government was creating too many inflexible and costly programs that reduced a state's ability to cope with social and financial problems it considered more pressing.

Clinton is not proposing to roll back 12 years of federal mandates, but he does not add new ones. In addition, his economic stimulus package calls for spending about $15 billion in the states in the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30, including $3.75 billion for transportation, $850 million to comply with federal clean-water standards, $300 million for immunizations and $1 billion for summer employment.

In the 1980s, by comparison, the Reagan and Bush administrations reduced federal aid to the states by 15 percent and to local governments by 55 percent, after accounting for inflation.

"It looks like a new ball game for the states," said Steven D. Gold, director of the Center for the Study of the States at the Rockefeller Institute in Albany, N.Y. "At least in the first inning, the federal government is proposing to help the states instead of shifting burdens to them."

Arthur L. Jones, a deputy press secretary to Clinton, said, "It had always been the president's idea to have the element of fairness measured at every level, including the relationship between the federal government and the states, and I think that has been accomplished.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Clinton Plan Draws Praise for Aiding State Fiscal Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?