Few Consider Middle-Class Tax Cut a Good Idea

By Rosenbaum, David E. | THE JOURNAL RECORD, December 15, 1994 | Go to article overview

Few Consider Middle-Class Tax Cut a Good Idea


Rosenbaum, David E., THE JOURNAL RECORD


WASHINGTON _ The Republicans have their proposal for a middle-class tax cut. Not to be one-upped, Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri, the House Democratic leader, offered his plan Tuesday. President Clinton will probably put forward his own tax cut for the middle class in a speech tonight.

The proposals have these things in common: They are frightfully expensive in terms of what they would cost the government in lost revenue. They spread the money so thin that they offer middle-income families less than what it costs to buy a pizza a week. And most economists, regardless of their politics or ideology, view such tax cuts as a lousy idea.

The last is not surprising. Proposals for a middle-class tax cut are not about the economy. They are all about political positioning.

Take Gephardt's plan, which would reduce the taxes of all households with annual incomes below $75,000. In a speech Tuesday morning, he said, "We ought to be focusing help to the hard-pressed, squeezed, middle-income families that are either standing still or have been moving behind for the last 15 years."

In other words, the swing voters who determine election results.

Neither Gephardt nor his staff would say exactly how much his plan would cost or how large a tax break he was contemplating for each family.

But say he decided to offer each family $300 a year, or about 82 cents a day. In 1991, the last year for which statistics are available, there were 107 million taxpayers with pretax income below $75,000, about 94 percent of all taxpayers.

If each one got a tax cut of $300, it would cost the government $32.1 billion (107 million times $300), which is half again as much as the government spends each year on Aid to Families With Dependent Children, the main federal welfare program.

Gephardt said he would find spending reductions to offset the tax breaks. But as has been the case with Republicans, he declined to be specific.

The plan being pushed by Republicans in the House of Representatives would offer each family with income below $200,000 (99 percent of all taxpayers) and children in the household a $500 tax credit for each child. That means that a family with two children would have its taxes reduced by $1,000. The 64 percent of taxpayers who have no dependent children would get nothing.

Generally, the more income that taxpayers have, the more likely they are to have dependent children. For instance, 55 percent of taxpayers with incomes from $100,000 to $200,000 in 1991 claimed at least one exemption for a dependent. Only 42 percent of the taxpayers with incomes from $30,000 to $35,000 claimed such an exemption.

The Republican staff of the House Budget Committee reported last year that the plan would cost the Treasury about $20 billion a year. IRS figures show that about 40 million taxpayers have children and an income less than $200,000; 40 million taxpayers times $500 comes to exactly $20 billion.

Some families, of course, have more than one child and thus would get a bigger credit.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Few Consider Middle-Class Tax Cut a Good Idea
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.