Appeals Court OKs Microsoft Settlement

By Wells, Rob | THE JOURNAL RECORD, June 17, 1995 | Go to article overview

Appeals Court OKs Microsoft Settlement


Wells, Rob, THE JOURNAL RECORD


WASHINGTON _ Microsoft Corp., beset by battles with government regulators, won a legal victory Friday when a federal appeals court approved a settlement over anticompetitive marketing practices _ and rebuked a federal judge who emerged as a powerful critic of the computer software maker.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a lower court judge should not have rejected an antitrust settlement between the Justice Department and Microsoft, the largest personal computer software company.

The pact required Microsoft to alter contracts with personal computer manufacturers that allegedly shut out competing operating system software.

More significantly, the appeals court disqualified U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin, saying he exceeded his authority by attempting to broaden the case. The three-member appeals court returned the case to a different lower court judge with a recommendation for approval.

Wall Street welcomed the development, sending Microsoft stock up $2.12 to close at $87 a share on the Nasdaq Stock Market on heavy volume of 5.8 million shares.

Legal experts said the outcome wasn't surprising given the controversial nature of Sporkin's decision, which the Justice Department earlier called "an invitation to anarchy in the enforcement of antitrust law." Sporkin, in a brief telephone interview, declined comment, saying he was still reading the opinion.

But the significance could be overshadowed by a new Justice Department antitrust investigation of Microsoft, announced last week, into its proposed on-line network and software patent infringement agreements.

"If the government takes action on the network and patents, then this decision is not of significance for the industry," said Gary Reback, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based attorney representing software companies highly critical of Microsoft.

Just last month, Microsoft dropped its planned $2 billion merger with personal finance software Intuit Inc. after the Justice Department sued to block the merger.

Kimberly Ellwanger, a senior corporate attorney for Microsoft, said the company was "absolutely delighted with today's decision," which resolves a major portion of the government's 4-year investigation of its business practices.

At issue was so-called "consent decree" the Justice Department and Microsoft reached last July concerning Microsoft's licensing agreements with personal computer makers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Appeals Court OKs Microsoft Settlement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.