Oil Industry Caught in Air Pollution Questions

By Jane Kay and Dick Rogers San Francisco Examiner | THE JOURNAL RECORD, February 18, 1997 | Go to article overview

Oil Industry Caught in Air Pollution Questions


Jane Kay and Dick Rogers San Francisco Examiner, THE JOURNAL RECORD


SAN FRANCISCO -- On Dec. 10, 1992, the Tosco Corp. oil refinery belched a noxious, oily gas over parts of Concord, Calif., for four hours, drawing dozens of complaints from residents of headaches, nausea and "real stinky air."

After eight months of wrangling with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District over two citations for improperly burning waste gas, the refinery finally paid its fine: $1,010.

From Richmond to Benicia, where five major refineries each day handle roughly 740,000 barrels of crude oil worth nearly $15 million, small fines are the rule. While polluting Bay waters with oil could cost companies more than 500 times as much, the median punishment for refineries that befoul the air is $625, an Examiner investigation shows. Since 1990, the refineries -- Tosco in Martinez, Chevron Corp. in Richmond, Exxon Corp. in Benicia, Shell Oil Co. in Martinez and Unocal Corp. in Rodeo -- have committed 1,007 violations of pollution rules. On 666 occasions they were fined for breaking regulations aimed at stopping black clouds, gas and vapor leaks, hazardous chemical discharges and pollution of neighborhoods. Sixty-nine of the fines were greater than $1,000; 597 were $1,000 or less. An additional 144 such violations are being challenged by the refineries, and there were 197 violations considered less serious. The analysis mirrors an Examiner review of air board practices in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Since then, there has been no reduction in the yearly number of violations, nor have the fines increased. Roughly two weeks after an explosion killed one man and injured 44 others after a 12-inch oil pipeline ruptured at Tosco, there is renewed interest in whether penalties are stiff enough to deter health and safety violations. "Perhaps it's time we ought to review the imposition of penalties for violations of the air laws," said state Sen. Byron Sher, a Palo Alto Democrat and author of the California Clean Air Act. "This is an issue that ought to be revisited. Why is it you have one standard for oil spills and another for air emissions?" Under the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act, passed by the Legislature the year after the disastrous Exxon Valdez accident in 1989, the state requires a $500,000 fine for those who "reasonably should have known" they were causing more than a barrel of oil to spill into marine waters. But if refineries dump toxic chemicals into the air, the state Health and Safety Code dictates that fines range from $1,000 to a maximum of $50,000, depending upon whether the violation is accidental, negligent or intentional. Negotiations between refineries and the air board usually result in smaller fines. "If you start out with a low fine, then there's no incentive to make improvements at the refinery," said former Assemblyman Bob Campbell of Richmond, now a member of the California Coastal Commission. "Hell, yes, I'd pay $1,000 fine three or four times rather than pay $800,000 to fix what may be wrong," he said. "The fines are too cheap. That's like telling your son or daughter, `If you don't behave, I'm going to take a penny out of your $3 allowance.'" After a 1993 accident at General Chemical Co. in Richmond sent 22,000 people to the hospital for checkups, Campbell introduced a bill that would have increased penalties for toxic air discharges, including heavy fines for catastrophic events. The bill, supported by the California District Attorneys Association, passed the Assembly but failed in a Senate committee in August 1994 under heavy lobbying by the oil and chemical industries. Refineries say bigger penalties won't make for cleaner air and safer conditions. "The biggest incentive for our company is an incident-free operation," said Hal Holt, manager of public affairs at the Chevron refinery in Richmond. "We intend to be in compliance or beyond compliance all of the time. "Irrespective of any fining, those are our goals and our objectives. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Oil Industry Caught in Air Pollution Questions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.