Supreme Court Ends Term with Big Business Decisions

By Bob Drummond Bloomberg News | THE JOURNAL RECORD, July 1, 1997 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court Ends Term with Big Business Decisions

Bob Drummond Bloomberg News, THE JOURNAL RECORD

WASHINGTON -- The business world celebrated historic victories and suffered stinging defeats during the Supreme Court term that ended Friday.

In some of the biggest decisions -- announced during the term's final week -- the high court stood up for free speech in cyberspace, raised stiff hurdles to class-action settlements of large personal- injury cases and backed tough law enforcement powers for curbing insider trading.

Still, in business disputes, the nine-month session was vividly characterized by a lack of defining ideology from nine justices who were most comfortable with a deliberate, case-by-case approach that sometimes raised more questions than it answered. "They tended to decide business cases narrowly," Washington appellate lawyer Charles Rothfeld said. "They're not really on an ideological warpath. They don't want to make mistakes." "If one thing's sure," Supreme Court litigator Carter Phillips said, "it's that if it's not clear, it'll come back up." For companies and their lawyers, though, Phillips said, "it's a very frustrating thing." In a prime example of that trend, the Supreme Court seemed to simply surrender after trying to clear up important but complex questions about when to start a four-year statute of limitations for lawsuits under a federal racketeering law, which is increasingly used to seek stiff penalties for business-related fraud. Faced with four conflicting legal theories by different judges, the high court earlier this month rejected one approach that gave people the longest time to file a lawsuit. Because that was enough to settle the specific case at hand, the justices decided not to decide among the other three. That move continues to leave companies and their lawyers in the dark -- prompting Justice Antonin Scalia to accuse his colleagues of "timidity" for failing to "summon the courage to unravel . . . the mess." In another high-stakes business dispute, the justices reviewed an appeal by General Motors Corp.'s Hughes Electronics subsidiary, which asked the high court to settle several common and crucial questions about when companies can be sued by corporate whistleblowers alleging government-contracting fraud. The court unanimously found a relatively limited legal reason to throw out the suit against Hughes, without addressing several far more sweeping questions that continue to confront a wide range of government contractors. "It's a nice win for Hughes, but doesn't do much to tell the rest of us what the law means," Phillips said. The high court ended with a bang, as the justices handed down almost a quarter of their opinions for the year -- including most of the term's marquee cases -- during five frantic days before starting their summer break. On Thursday, Internet-related companies got perhaps the business community's biggest victory in a landmark decision to strike down a law that made it a crime to post indecent material on a computer network where children might see it. That came a day after the asbestos industry was stung by a ruling that threw out a $1.3 billion class-action settlement designed to protect 20 companies from all current and future lawsuits over asbestos-related injuries. The high court imposed stiff rules about when large groups of lawsuits can be resolved in a single settlement, undermining a company's ability to eliminate massive legal problems in a one class- action agreement. In other high profile cases, the court upheld federal rules that require cable television companies to carry the signals of local broadcast stations, ratified rules that make it easier for patent owners to claim infringement damages from competing products that are similar to patented inventions and upheld the U.S. Department of Agriculture's ability to impose mandatory fees on farmers and ranchers to pay for generic industry advertising. During the last week of the term, the high court handed federal prosecutors a major victory when it upheld their ability to press insider-trading charges against investors who aren't true company insiders. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Supreme Court Ends Term with Big Business Decisions


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.