FTC Wages High-Stakes Privacy Gamble

By John Markoff N. Y. Times News Service | THE JOURNAL RECORD, December 26, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

FTC Wages High-Stakes Privacy Gamble


John Markoff N. Y. Times News Service, THE JOURNAL RECORD


In agreeing to let private information brokers and credit reporting companies be governed by voluntary privacy protection guidelines, the Federal Trade Commission is betting that companies that maintain vast computerized dossiers on people and businesses can police themselves in the face of ever more powerful information technologies.

Many civil libertarians insist the FTC's bet is a high-stakes gamble with the privacy rights of all Americans.

The agreement sets in motion the first meaningful trial of the Clinton administration's privacy policy, the stated goal of which is to protect individual privacy in the Internet age without resorting to new laws and regulations. The agreement clearly defines the two camps -- corporate America and privacy rights groups -- that are struggling for ascendancy in a networked world in which corporations increasingly rely on consumer data bases for myriad aspects of their business. The data companies are in effect saying that they can be trusted to act responsibly and to police their own ranks. Known variously as "individual reference services" or "look-up services," businesses like Lexis-Nexis, Equifax and Information America gather and sell many types of very private data, including credit and financial histories and medical records. Such information is widely used by banks, mortgage companies, insurance companies, law enforcement officials, direct marketers and others. While the new guidelines will permit consumers to "opt out" of these commercial databases in some cases, they do not offer individuals any new access to information about themselves held in the computers of look-up services. The agreement does not offer average people an easy way to check what personal information about them is being sold or to find out who is getting it, nor are people given a means to contest its accuracy. Privacy groups argue that the new guidelines are insufficient, especially because they offer no remedies for people who believe they have been harmed by the dissemination of information in commercial data bases. The guidelines are the data industry's response to the public outcry that erupted last year after it became known that a major data provider, Lexis-Nexis, was making Social Security information available to the general public via the Internet. Under the new guidelines, data companies will hide certain kinds of information from the public while continuing to make the information available to qualified customers, including law enforcement agencies and private investigators. "There will be no Social Security information or birth dates available over the Internet," said Tim Davies, chief operating officer of National Information Services at Lexis-Nexis, a division of Reed Elsevier. Davies acknowledged that the agreement also clearly defines the difference between the U.S. government and European governments with regard to privacy protection. The Clinton administration is now in the midst of a debate with the European Union over a strict new privacy directive scheduled to go into effect next year across Europe. Europe is set to enforce a strict Data Protection Directive that would cut off the flow of commercial data to nations whose privacy protections are deemed inadequate.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

FTC Wages High-Stakes Privacy Gamble
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?