Public Isn't Always Willing to Pay for New Stadiums

By Richard Sandomir N. Y. Times News Service | THE JOURNAL RECORD, May 8, 1998 | Go to article overview

Public Isn't Always Willing to Pay for New Stadiums


Richard Sandomir N. Y. Times News Service, THE JOURNAL RECORD


NEW YORK -- Seventy-five years ago, Jacob Ruppert and Tillinghast Huston built Yankee Stadium for $2.5 million, without debates over where to locate the stadium, how much money the city would chip in or how many luxury suites were needed to maximize their cash flow. It was their money, no arguments.

Today, it is almost impossible to find a city where there isn't fierce, even ugly, debate. From New York to Pittsburgh to Milwaukee to Seattle, governments and taxpayers have been faced with the question of how much to pay for building new stadiums or arenas -- or risk teams fleeing to other cities. At the same time, economists continue to cast doubt on the monetary benefits cities reap from new playing fields.

Such a debate has erupted in New York between Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who wants to use at least $600 million in city business taxes to help finance stadiums for the Yankees and Mets, and City Council President Peter Vallone, who wants a November referendum to let the voters decide. Giuliani, who sarcastically dismissed Vallone's call for a referendum, said he was prepared to invoke little-used powers under the City Charter to block a vote in November. If the experience of other cities is any guide, the mayor may have good reason to want to avoid such a vote. While referendums have passed in some cities over the past few years, voters in others have rejected measures to use tax money to build new arenas and made their political displeasure known. On Tuesday, for example, voters in two North Carolina counties roundly defeated a plan to raise money from taxes on food and baseball tickets to finance a stadium to lure the Minnesota Twins to the region. The rejection of numerous plans by the Minnesota Legislature to publicly finance a new stadium led to the team's owner, the banker Carl Pohlad, to tentatively agree to sell the club to a Hickory, N.C., businessman. Last November in Pittsburgh, voters in an 11-county area overwhelmingly rejected a half-cent sales tax increase intended to bankroll new stadiums for the Pirates and Steelers, the expansion of a downtown convention center and other projects. The previous May, in Columbus, Ohio, voters defeated a 1/2-cent sales-tax increase that would have financed the construction of a hockey arena and a soccer stadium. And in San Francisco, voters have repeatedly rejected using tax dollars to finance a new stadium for the Giants. But if those cities are examples of voter dissatisfaction -- and sometimes disdain for using public funds to help out wealthy team owners -- they also provide lessons for government officials on coming up with other, more creative tactics. When Pittsburgh voters turned down the sales-tax increase, politicians went to work on alternative financing. Now a hodgepodge of proposals called "Plan B" has developed, including using a portion of an existing county sales tax, a ticket surcharge, a tax on visiting athletes, and hefty contributions from the teams.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Public Isn't Always Willing to Pay for New Stadiums
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.