Controversy Still Brews over the New Ergonomics Rules

By Ray Carter The Journal Record | THE JOURNAL RECORD, March 19, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Controversy Still Brews over the New Ergonomics Rules


Ray Carter The Journal Record, THE JOURNAL RECORD


When the Occupational Safety & Health Administration passed new workplace ergonomics rules during the closing days of the Clinton administration, it set off an uproar in the business community. Then, almost as suddenly, Congress and President Bush repealed those rules in a marathon three-day process that began on March 6.

Now, even though the battle was over almost as soon as it started, the controversy lingers. In Oklahoma, business leaders are praising the repeal as a victory against an overreaching regulatory system, while organized labor believes the repeal represents a defeat for low-wage workers suffering from serious injuries.

"We are passing a lot more rules and regulations that impact the citizens of this country and the businesses of this country through rulemaking than we're ever doing through the legislative process," said Mike Seney, vice president of The State Chamber. "And that's dangerous. When we create an agency and give them carte blanche to pass any rule or regulation that they want to and don't have a check to stop them from getting excessive, we basically have abdicated our democracy to a bunch of bureaucrats."

Seney said the repeal of the OSHA regulations under the provisions of the Congressional Review Act is a shot across the bow, warning regulators that there is now a checks-and-balances system in place to prevent regulatory excess.

Organized labor officials, predictably, see things differently.

"We find more and more that politicians seem to think that the people that drive the truck or the people that work in the warehouse or the people that sweep the floor or the guy who gets up at 4 a.m. and turns the lights on for the executives -- the people who do all the things that are necessary -- are more of a throw-away item to the wealthy and to some politicians," said Terry Raulston, president and business manager of Teamsters Local Union 886.

While the OSHA regulations dominated headlines for only a handful of days at the beginning of March, the ergonomics rulemaking process was ongoing for nearly a decade. Union officials argue that business leaders had the chance to influence the regulations on numerous occasions, but chose instead to strong-arm labor groups through the legislative process.

But Kathy Teel, president of The Compliance Company, a business consulting firm, said business leaders let their guard down during the rulemaking process.

"The business community, kind of thinking -- well, this is so vague, they'll never pin it down, they'll never be able to promulgate good regulations -- had sort of let the unions all lobby about that and not taken it very seriously," she said. "And then all of a sudden now, here we have finalized standards on Jan. 16. And that woke everybody up."

The ergonomics rules addressed musculoskeletal injuries, a broad category often caused by repetitive motion that gradually injure a worker.

From one point of view, business leaders were correct: OSHA was not able to provide a precise definition of a musculoskeletal injury. But the agency attempted to address the issue anyway. The definition the agency eventually developed "was so vague" that it included "everything that might go wrong with an employee," Teel said. That led employers to believe their paperwork burden would skyrocket under the new federal program.

In addition, while the standard addressed only work-related musculoskeletal disorders, the OSHA regulations prevented an employer from communicating with an employee's physician to find out if an injury was truly work-related. Teel said that provision was an "open door" for abuse.

Most importantly for business owners, the regulation required that employers pay up to 90 percent of the employee's pay and benefits for up to 90 days if the employee had to be off work. That regulation appeared to override the provisions of many state worker's compensation systems, Teel said.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Controversy Still Brews over the New Ergonomics Rules
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?