Flood Risk Wheeze That Could Drown City Bonuses

The Evening Standard (London, England), April 12, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Flood Risk Wheeze That Could Drown City Bonuses

THE Thames Gateway is that vast tract of land stretching from Canary Wharf down

to the Dartford river crossing. It is where the planners hope to build enough homes over the next 20 years to accommodate the extra three-quarters of a million people they expect to be living in London by that time, though there is one little-discussed problem with this. At a recent conference on climate change, one speaker pointed out that even a modest increase in sea levels could make the whole area very prone to flooding and most of these yet-to-be-built homes could therefore be uninsurable.

Naturally enough, climate change has got the insurance industry worried because many of the bills from the consequent extreme weather conditions are likely to land in its lap. It is a cost it is unwilling and perhaps unable to bear entirely on its own. Hence its active search for finding new ways to cover the risk, the most interesting of which emerged earlier this week when the German insurer Allianz successfully sold $150 million of bonds which are triggered to pay up in the event of a designated flood or specified disaster.

This spreads the potential losses well beyond the insurance company, but the intriguing thing is how far this could go.

Currently the buyers of such bonds are sophisticated professional investors, but there is no reason why, using the internet, the risk could not be spread much wider still to the extent, even, that one would no longer need the insurance company.

A crude model of how this might work already exists with Betfair, the online gambling site where participants bet against each other. Some people ask for odds on, for example, the result of a football match while it is in progress, or the chances of an England cricketer getting to his century. Others supply the odds and take the bet. There is no bookmaker in the middle to price the trade and bring both sides of the bet together. The only issue is secure payment between counterparties who do not know each other, and in this case it is solved by credit cards and deposits.

The insurance model would simply require the owner of a risk offering it on the net, probably with a suggested price to see if there were any takers or with a request that someone out there make an offer. Agreed, it does sound far-fetched and ignores the complexity and asymmetry of information of most insurance contracts.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Flood Risk Wheeze That Could Drown City Bonuses


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?