Rethinking Place of Business as Choice of Law in Class Action Lawsuits

By Gruenwald, Allison M. | Vanderbilt Law Review, November 2005 | Go to article overview

Rethinking Place of Business as Choice of Law in Class Action Lawsuits


Gruenwald, Allison M., Vanderbilt Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

In the past century, businesses have come to operate on a national and often global level. In the past century, the United States has seen an enormous nationalization and even globalization of business. As a result, the actions of a single company increasingly have the potential to affect people far beyond the boundaries of that company's home state. When one or a few companies injure large numbers of consumers across the country, aggregate litigation (namely the class action lawsuit) becomes an especially attractive remedy. Aggregating claims allows plaintiffs to save time and money and may also enable them to present a more compelling case by showing the extent of damages a defendant allegedly caused.

Though some of this litigation arises under federal law, many of the underlying claims are governed by state law. Therefore, before a court can aggregate the claims and allow plaintiffs to proceed as a nationwide class, it must decide which state's law will apply to the claims. This decision frequently creates a classic "choice-of-law problem."1

Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes class actions as a form of aggregate litigation.2 For certification under Rule 23(b)(3),3 plaintiffs must show that "questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members" and that the class action device will provide a superior method of adjudication.4 Rule 23(b)(3) lists a number of factors that the court should consider in making the certification decision, including "the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action."5 A court will not likely certify a class action that encompasses too many variations in either law or fact because the class will not meet the predominance requirement or the manageability standard.

In many class actions based on state law claims,6 plaintiffs seeking certification have been able to prove that common questions of fact exist, or at least that the class can be divided into manageable subclasses, based on common factual backgrounds.7 However, the requirement that there be common questions of law raises a unique set of problems8 which have, until recently, barred plaintiffs from achieving certification of a nationwide class when the claims are based in state law.9 State choice-of-law rules often create a situation in which the court deciding the case has to apply the laws of different states to the different class members. When a single court must apply an unmanageable number of variations in state law to the class members from different states, common questions of law do not predominate. Therefore, the class cannot be certified.

This choice-of-law problem is no small issue. In fact, it can have such a debilitating effect on an effort to bring nationwide class actions that it has come to the forefront of recent class action reform debate in Congress. With the passage of the Class Action Fairness Act,10 it will now be easier for defendants to remove class actions to federal court.11 As federal courts are perceived as less hospitable to plaintiff classes, allowing removal is expected to increase the defendant's chances of successfully having a class decertified once it is in federal court.12 An amendment to this act, proposed by Senator Feinstein, would have limited a defendant's ability to have a class removed to federal court and then decertified on choice-of-law grounds.13 The proposed amendment stated:

(1) the district court shall not deny class certification, in whole or in part, on the ground that the law of more than 1 State will be applied; (2) the district court shall require each party to submit their recommendations for subclassifications among the plaintiff class based on substantially similar State law; and (3) the district court shall- (A) issue subclassifications, as determined necessary, to permit the action to proceed; or (B) if the district court determines such subclassifications are an impracticable method of managing the action, the district court shall attempt to ensure that plaintiffs' State laws are applied to the extent practical. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Rethinking Place of Business as Choice of Law in Class Action Lawsuits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.