The Political Sociology of Freedom: Adam Ferguson and F. A. Hayek

By Ebeling, Richard M. | Freeman, April 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Political Sociology of Freedom: Adam Ferguson and F. A. Hayek

Ebeling, Richard M., Freeman

The Political Sociology of Freedom: Adam Ferguson and F. A. Hayek by Ronald Hmowy Edward Elgar * 2005 * 265 pages * $110

When I was a young economics major back in the 1970s, one of the standard arguments that many of my professors would hurl at me was: "Your ideal of free-market capitalism may have been all right 200 years ago, when society was a lot simpler, but in a society as complex as ours is today, such a policy of laissez faire just won't work. The complexity of modern life requires the government to interfere and regulate to see that everything works harmoniously, otherwise there would be chaos." Any reference I made to Adam Smith's "invisible hand" in The Wealth of Nations brought forth mockery and snide remarks.

The idea that a complex social order can arise and function without a human creator who designs and guides it often seems counterintuitive to our everyday experience. All that we consume shows signs of human planning and human action.The farmers plant the crops and bring them to harvest. The manufacturers design and oversee the production processes that bring all desired goods and services to market. All works of art and literature are the result of creative minds that put paint on canvas or words on a page.

Surely, it is said, there must an overarching design to fit all those individual plans into a society-wide coordinated pattern, just as the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle fit properly together. In the history of ideas, there have been two groups of thinkers who not only challenged that presumption, but who also showed how social order evolves and coordinates the actions of multitudes of people, without a planner imposing a design on everyone: the Scottish moral philosophers and the Austrian economists.

Ronald Hamowy offers a fairly detailed exposition of many of their ideas in The Political Sociology of Freedom. In this series of essays Hamowy traces the development of a theory of spontaneous social order in the works of Bernard Mandeville, David Hume, Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson, and a number of other writers of the eighteenth century. Their premise was that if man and society are to be properly studied and understood, we must use our reason and the historical record to find out what is the actual nature of man and how society's institutions actually come into existence.

Their conclusion was that man is a frail and imperfect creature, who applies his reasoning to solve problems, but who is also influenced by his passions. Man's knowledge is far from perfect about his past and current circumstances, and especially weak about what the future might hold. While capable of cruel and violent acts, man's nature also contains a spirit of benevolence based on his desire and need for the company of others. He is far from the hyper-rationalistic "economic man" that critics of the market later tried to portray him as.

What their study of history demonstrated was that none of the institutions and social norms of interpersonal conduct and commerce had been introduced by some great and all-knowing philosopher king; nor had their development and change over the centuries been anticipated or even thought about by those whose actions brought them into existence. (As the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises once expressed it, "History is made by men. . . . But the historical process is not designed by individuals .

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Political Sociology of Freedom: Adam Ferguson and F. A. Hayek


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?