Systemic Flaws in Our Criminal Justice System

Judicature, March/April 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Systemic Flaws in Our Criminal Justice System

Reforms that have been implemented or suggested in recent years in the death penalty context reveal systemic flaws in the criminal justice system.

This issue of Judicature presents a series of articles on the death penalty from a variety of perspectives that are not always heard on this vexing issue. We publish these pieces to enrich the discussion of a subject that has dominated criminal justice dialogue for many years. Yet, in the course of reviewing these articles, we were struck by a point made by Professors Carol and Jordan Steiker concerning the impact that death penalty litigation has had on the larger criminal justice system. Since death penalty litigation and political debate about capital punishment have focused on claims of innocence and constitutional error, it is not surprising that the reforms that have been implemented or suggested in recent years in the death penalty context have revealed systemic flaws in the criminal justice system.

In the capital arena, the most significant development has been the DNA revolution. In the past 15 years, over 170 persons, including a significant number who had spent time on death row, have been exonerated by post-conviction DNA testing. DNA evidence is available in a limited number of cases (homicides, rape, and some assaults), but there is no reason to think that the errors that have been uncovered in DNA exoneration cases do not infect a very large number of non-DNA cases.

Recently, in Virginia, a random review of cases in which DNA evidence was available post-conviction (but not yet tested) yielded an error rate of 6 percent. Extrapolation over the criminal justice system in this state alone would result in a finding of thousands of wrongful convictions. Moreover, in the 1990s, when the FBI began testing DNA evidence in ongoing criminal investigations, the forensic tests cleared "prime suspects" in over 20 percent of the cases.

Exoneration cases thus tell us far more than the compelling personal stories of individuals wrongly convicted and imprisoned. In every one of them, something went seriously wrong to permit the conviction of an innocent person. There have been reviews of these cases to determine what caused these disturbing results, and this work provides us with a window into a number of systemic flaws in our criminal justice system:

* In 80 percent of the cases there were mistaken eyewitness identifications;

* in 20 percent of the cases there were false or coerced confessions;

* in 50 percent of the cases the police or prosecuting attorney failed to disclose exculpatory evidence;

* in 40 percent of the cases defense counsel were ineffective;

* in 20 percent of the cases jailhouse informants provided false information;

* in a number of cases the forensic evidence was presented in a false or misleading manner.

Fortunately, each of these problems is susceptible to reforms that can protect the innocent without undue costs to effective and fair law enforcement practices. We sketch here one possible set of reforms, based on steps already taken in some jurisdictions, reports of blue ribbon commissions, and court decisions. Some of these matters are within the initial agenda of AJS' new Commission on Forensic Science and Public Policy.

1. Eyewitness identifications. For many years, studies have shown eyewitness misidentifications to be the single largest cause of wrongful convictions. A number of controlled studies have shown that errors are significantly reduced upon the institution of a number of related procedures: (a) witnesses are told that the perpetrator may not be in the lineup or photo-spread, (b) the detective conducting the identification procedure does not know the identity of the primary suspect, (c) photographs or persons are shown sequentially to the witness to avoid the normal instinct to select the person who looks most like the perpetrator, and (d) a statement of the confidence level of the witness is recorded at the time of the identification.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Systemic Flaws in Our Criminal Justice System


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?