The Impacts of Capital Cases on a Federal Trial Court

By Goldberger, Benjamin A. | Judicature, March/April 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Impacts of Capital Cases on a Federal Trial Court


Goldberger, Benjamin A., Judicature


As the first capital case tried in Boston in over 30 years demonstrated, such cases present unique challenges.

Capital cases often present severe challenges and stresses for a federal trial court and the individuals who perform its work: judges, court staff, andjurors. These challenges are frequently amplified when the government brings a death penalty case under federal law in a state that does not itself provide for capital punishment.

Some of the challenges posed by capital cases are the same as those presented by other complex litigation. Capital cases are time consuming, emotionally draining affairs that often involve lengthy jury trials. This alone challenges the court's ability to manage the hundreds of other cases pending before any one district court judge. The strain and delay on the administration of justice in other cases is particularly acute if a capital case is brought in a division that has but one or two judges.

Other issues are unique to capital cases or are present in only capital cases and a few other types of criminal trials. This article discusses some of these unique challenges, drawing on my experience working on a death penalty case as a law clerk in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts from 2002 to 2004. As Massachusetts no longer provides for the death penalty under state law, that prosecution, United States v. Gary Lee Sampson, was the first capital case tried to verdict in Boston in over 30 years.

Appointment of counsel and experts

Although appointment and oversight of counsel for indigent criminal defendants are not issues unique to capital cases, the defense of capital cases is typically more complex than the defense of other criminal cases. Section 848(q) of Title 21 of the United States Code describes the procedures for appointing counsel and reimbursement of "investigative, expert, or other services [that] are reasonably necessary for the representation of the defendant." Federal law requires a judge to appoint at least two lawyers to serve as defense counsel in a capital case, in large part because of the separate penalty phase of the bifurcated trial, which is governed by law and practice unlike any other proceeding in any other kind of criminal case. Depending on the case, private investigators, jury consultants, expert witnesses-including mental health experts-and other non-testifying experts may be "reasonably necessary for the representation of the defendant." In particular, mitigation specialists have become integral parts of many if not most capital defense teams. Failure to provide adequate expert support for a capital defendant may result in an unfair trial.

Oversight of these experts individually and as part of an overall case budget becomes the responsibility of the presiding district judge. Once the costs for experts exceed $7,500-a trivial sum in the context of capital cases that cost, on average, hundreds of thousands of dollars to defend-the law requires additional review by the chief judge of the circuit, or his or her designee. Oversight over budgeting consumes judicial resources. It also places the trial judge in the somewhat awkward position of serving as a gatekeeper for the resources needed to try a capital case for one side of the adversarial process, but not the other.

The costs of defense and difficulties for the court are enhanced when the government brings a capital case in a jurisdiction that does not have an established capital defense bar. In such cases, experienced capital defense counsel and others, such as mitigation specialists, will likely need to be brought in from other jurisdictions. Thus, in the Sampson case, the defense team included two lawyers from Boston, one lawyer from New Jersey, mental health experts from Boston and New York City, and a mitigation specialist from Wisconsin, among others.

Using a defense team comprised of individuals from multiple locations creates logistical problems.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Impacts of Capital Cases on a Federal Trial Court
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?