Can We Talk?

By Fund, John H. | The American Spectator, July/August 2006 | Go to article overview

Can We Talk?


Fund, John H., The American Spectator


AFTER EVERY MID-TERM ELECTION, establishment Democrats tend to have what they call "The Conversation." It's effectively about settling on the most liberal presidential candidate skillful enough to fool enough Americans into electing him-or her. In 1992, the consensus choice was Bill Clinton. In 2000. it was reluctantly Al Gore, largely because he was the sitting vice president during a time of prosperity. For 2008, the conversation is being held several months early, accelerated by the front-runner status of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Democrats are convinced that the New York senator can be nominated. They're just not sure if she is too polarizing and frosty a figure to get elected. A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 42 percent of voters would definitely not consider supporting her for president. By comparison, only 28 percent said the same about John McCain. Howard Fineman of Newsweek puts it bluntly: "The Democratic Party's sawiest veterans-elected officials in their Capitol Hill suites, Hollywood machers tooling along the Santa Monica Freeway in their Priuses, the New York soft money crowd eating their egg-white omelets at the Regency in Manhattan-are convinced that Hillary Can't Win."

That helps explain why every Democrat worth his brie and Chablis was buzzing in May about a frontpage New York Times story on the Clinton marriage. While the article contained no great revelations, a reporter had spent three months and interviewed over 50 people about the relationship. The paper's conclusion was that the state of the Clinton union will be a continuing object of journalistic interest before the 2008 election. As the Times noted: "When the subject of Bill and Hilary Clinton comes up among many prominent Democrats these days, topic A is the state of their marriage and how it might affect her possible bid."

Party insiders aren't talking much about this on the record, no doubt because they fear the wrath of Bill 'n Hil should they talk. But the liberal journalists they consort with are happy to channel their thoughts publicly. Michael Duffy of Time magazine says Democratic Party donors are sufficiently worried about new Clinton stories surfacing that they "have been asking reporters to sort of look into this because I think they don't want to get down the road in a year or two with a front runner who's no longer viable.... They don't want to get burned again."

Party elders also have other concerns about a Hillary Clinton candidacy. Gloria Borger of U.S. News & World Report said on NBC's Chris Matthews Show in May: "[Democrats are] worried that Bill Clinton is going to be the man behind the throne and that could be a problem in terms of running a presidential campaign."

FOLLOWING THE Times story, which went so far as to mention Mr. Clinton's friendship with Canadian politician and heiress Belinda Stronach, the consensus among party officials is that someone in the Clinton inner circle will have to approach Senator Clinton after the mid-term election for a discussion about how to address the inevitable public curiosity about the state of her marriage. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can We Talk?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.