Amicus Curiae Briefs: The Court's Perspective*

By Flango, Victor E.; Bross, Donald C. et al. | Justice System Journal, May 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Amicus Curiae Briefs: The Court's Perspective*


Flango, Victor E., Bross, Donald C., Corbally, Sarah, Justice System Journal


Amicus briefs can affect the perspective from which an appellate court views a case by showing how the decision is important to others not party to the case, by providing additional information and expertise that parties may not have, and by developing legal arguments that parties sometimes cannot. Whereas most studies of amicus curiae briefs focus on the influence of these third-party briefs on decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court, this article considers amicus curiae briefs in state appellate courts. Considering amicus briefs from this perspective promises to benefit both courts, because they can encourage the type of amicus briefs they find most helpful, and the organizations that file them, because they will have better information on what appellate courts look for in amicus briefs. How useful are amicus briefs to state courts of last resort? Most respondents, chief justices and appellate court clerks from the courts of last resort in thirty-nine states, viewed amicus briefs as a benefit but think they could be made more useful by being consolidated with other briefs where possible and by focusing on providing new information and implications of decisions not provided by the parties.

Most research on amicus curiae participation has been conducted from the perspective of the organizations seeking to influence particular court decisions (Epstein, 1993, 1994; Epstein and Knight, 1999; Kearney and Merrill, 2000; Krislov, 1963; O'Conner and Epstein, 1981-82). But what is the court perspective on amicus curiae briefs? To the extent that amicus briefs are prepared by parties with specialized knowledge, these briefs can help keep courts abreast of the latest scientific, medical, and social issues. Yet do courts find them useful as a source of new information in this era of extensive discovery, computer-assisted legal research, and a massive amount of readily available information? What proportion of amicus briefs provide information not otherwise available to the court and what portion simply provide "canned" arguments or reiterate the arguments of litigants? What criteria do courts use to distinguish useful from less useful briefs? When would courts encourage amicus briefs be filed? What, then, is the overall evaluation by courts of the value of amicus briefs?

Making explicit the court perspective on amicus briefs could be helpful to courts if that information helped organizations that participate as amici curiae understand the conditions under which courts would most welcome the filing of amicus briefs, the types of information that courts are most receptive to hearing, and generally what makes briefs that are filed more effective. Organizational resources are not unlimited, so surely it is in their interest that to make influential those amicus briefs that are filed. In this sense, amicus briefs can be viewed as an "in-kind" donation of information to courts.

Before addressing further the question of how amicus briefs can assist appellate courts, it may be useful to note that there is some disagreement over the role of amici curiae-are they friends of the court or friends of the party? The amicus curiae originated in early English common law as a "selfless servant of the court" (Kaye, 1989:10), and some believe that is the proper role. For example, Judge Robert Hemphill, senior judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, writes:

Amicus Curiae is a Latin phrase for "friend of the court" as distinguished from an advocate before the court. . . . It serves only for the benefit of the court, assisting the court in cases of general public interest . . . , by making suggestions to the court . . . , by providing supplementary assistance to existing counsel . . . , and by insuring the complete and plenary presentation of difficult issues so that the court may reach a proper decision (Alexander v. Hall, 1974, quoted in Comparato, 2003:1).

Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit, himself "the nation's most cited judge" (Munford, 1999:279), agreed that amicus curiae should be a "friend of the Court, not friend of the party" and he strongly criticized amicus briefs that "fail to present convincing reasons why the parties' briefs do not give us all the help we need for deciding the appeal" (see the often cited Ryan v. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Amicus Curiae Briefs: The Court's Perspective*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.