Does Moral Reasoning Represent Sociomoral Structure or Political Ideology? a Further Exploration of the Relations between Moral Reasoning, Political Attitudes, Consistency of Moral Thought, and the Evaluation of Human Rights in Dutch Young Adults

By Raaijmakers, Quinten A. W.; Van Hoof, Anne | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, July 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Does Moral Reasoning Represent Sociomoral Structure or Political Ideology? a Further Exploration of the Relations between Moral Reasoning, Political Attitudes, Consistency of Moral Thought, and the Evaluation of Human Rights in Dutch Young Adults


Raaijmakers, Quinten A. W., Van Hoof, Anne, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


The relations between moral reasoning and political attitudes were examined in a representative sample of 2520 Dutch adolescents and young adults. This study was repeated for a second, select sample, 210 Dutch university students. In the latter study both moral reasoning and political attitudes were related to the evaluation of the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Moral reasoning was measured using the N2 index of the Defining Issues Test (Rest. 1979a). Political attitudes were measured using 10 Likert-type multiitem scales, representing both the cultural and the economic dimension of general political ideology. Participants' general moral thought was identified through their evaluation of the 30 articles of the UDHR. The intraindividual consistency of the evaluation of the 30 UDHR articles was used as a measure of the structure of moral thought. Factor analyses revealed that moral reasoning represented something different from political ideology. Regression analyses demonstrated that only a minor part of the variance in moral reasoning scores could be predicted by the combined effect of political attitudes. Moral reasoning scores were not related to the consistency of the evaluation of the 30 UDHR articles. Using SEM analyses, several models were tested describing the relations of moral reasoning, political ideology and consistency with the evaluation of human rights. It appeared that these variables all uniquely contributed to the explanation of moral thought.

Keywords: moral reasoning, political attitudes, consistency, human rights, construct validity.

In cognitive-developmental theory, moral reasoning is understood as the manifestation of an inner-psychological and cognitive-developmental structure that governs action in situations in which moral claims conflict (Kohlberg, 1969). As a structure, moral reasoning is sharply distinguished from the content of moral judgments. Moral structures refer to general organizing principles or patterns of thought rather than specific moral beliefs or opinions (Colby, Kohlberg, & Kauffman, 1987, p. 2). The same premises underlie the various measures that are more or less closely related to Kohlberg's cognitive-developmental theory, such as the Moral Judgment Interview (MJI: Colby & Kohlberg, 1987) or paper-and-pencil tests such as the Defining Issues Test (DIT: Rest, 1979a), or the Socio-Moral Reflection Objective Measure (SROM: Gibbs, 1991). Whatever the specific theoretical claims of these tests, they all have in common the assumption that a general cognitive structure is measured rather than certain moral beliefs or specific attitudes associated with the politico-moral domain. In the determination of moral behavior and moral choices, moral reasoning is claimed to have its unique contribution parallel to other processes (i.e., motivational and ideological processes: see Kohlberg, 1986; Rest, Narvaez, Bebeau, & Thoma, 1999).

Several authors have strongly disputed the claim that moral reasoning represents a general sociomoral cognitive structure rather than a specific politico-moral attitude. Early critiques focused on the "liberal" and "American" bias in Kohlberg's theorizing and research (e.g., Shweder, 1982; Simpson, 1974). More recently, criticism has concentrated on the measurement of moral reasoning, referring to the Defining Issues Test (Rest, 1979a) as the most widely used measure of moral reasoning. Two different, though related, questions are separately raised. Lind (1995, in press) argues that the prevailing paper-and-pencil tests of moral reasoning are essentially preference measures, and in that sense capable of measuring only attitudes. In his view, a more suitable approach of measuring cognitive (or structuring) capacity is to assess the consistency of the individual ratings instead of the expressed preferences. In addition, Emler and colleagues reasoned that the strong correlation of moral reasoning scores with scores on certain political attitude scales in fact demonstrates their mutual origin: an individualistic political-cultural ideology, predominant in Western societies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Does Moral Reasoning Represent Sociomoral Structure or Political Ideology? a Further Exploration of the Relations between Moral Reasoning, Political Attitudes, Consistency of Moral Thought, and the Evaluation of Human Rights in Dutch Young Adults
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.