Segmenting Aggregate Litigation: Initiatives and Impediments for Reshaping the Trial Process

By Sherman, Edward F. | The Review of Litigation, October 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Segmenting Aggregate Litigation: Initiatives and Impediments for Reshaping the Trial Process


Sherman, Edward F., The Review of Litigation


I. INTRODUCTION

The paradigm for the American civil trial is a single event in which witnesses and evidence are presented seriatim in a continuous proceeding.1 American trials are generally before juries, and lengthy recesses or continuances are to be avoided because jurors cannot be expected to be on call, remember evidence, or be insulated from improper influences during long intermissions. In a classic article in 1976, Professor Abram Chayes pointed to the emergence of a different model for "public law litigation," such as school desegregation, employment discrimination, antitrust, securities fraud, corporate reorganizations, union governance, consumer fraud, and environmental management.2 Such cases, he said, involve multiple parties, a sprawling and amorphous structure, need for discovery of large amounts of information, lengthy pre-trial preparation, and complex forms of relief. The proceedings may be protracted, and the judge becomes "the dominant figure in organizing and building" the case, drawing "for support not only on the parties and their counsel, but on a wide range of outsiders-masters, experts, and oversight personnel."3

Many of the "public law" cases described by Professor Chayes were declaratory or injunctive suits tried to a judge, and thus the protracted and segmented nature of the litigation did not have to contend with juries. But the structural changes in public law litigation he described had their genesis in the "case management" movement that arose out of an avalanche of federal court anti-trust damage suits against the electrical equipment industry in the 1960s.4 A single-event trial simply would not work for such complex aggregate litigation-that is, litigation in which the claims of many individuals are aggregated, whether by joinder,5 consolidation,6 or class certification. The case management movement, as particularly reflected in the 1969 Manual for Complex Litigation* prescribed a protracted litigation process divided into various segments en route to ultimate resolution not so much by a single-event trial as through such means as motions, summary judgments, partial disposition of claims or parties, and settlement at various stages.9

A second movement in the last several decades that coincided with the "case management" movement has also had the effect of segmenting litigation and deviating from the single-event trial model. This is the "alternative dispute resolution" (ADR) movement that took root in the 1960s and ultimately came to be "courtannexed" in the 1980s and 1990s as an integral part of the litigation process.10 The ADR movement experimented with non-binding settlement processes, which, true to the label of "alternative," have been largely conducted by private mediators, arbitrators, and dispute resolution organizations and professionals. Although the ADR movement is more focused on settlement without trial than is case management (which ostensibly seeks to prepare cases for trial) both have a common objective of achieving resolution without trial. The result has been the segmentation of litigation through a variety of devices that focus on certain parts for early disposition, schedule separate disposition or trial of discrete issues, and look to trial runs or extrapolation from other cases to aid in resolution.

The procedural devices that have developed out of these two movements have had a significant impact on the trial process in aggregated cases. Unlike the "public law litigation" model, these developments apply primarily to private suits for damages, often against corporate defendants. Like the public law model, the model for aggregate litigation involves segmenting of the trial process, extensive case management, and complex remedies. But since aggregated cases generally anticipate a jury trial (although a high percentage never reach that point due to settlement), the model must also provide mechanisms for presenting manageable segments to juries and use intertwining case management and ADR procedures to facilitate settlement at various stages. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Segmenting Aggregate Litigation: Initiatives and Impediments for Reshaping the Trial Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.