Meta-Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Scientific Inquiry

By Beard, Margaret T.; Bailey, Catherine B. et al. | Journal of Theory Construction and Testing, Fall 2001 | Go to article overview

Meta-Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Scientific Inquiry


Beard, Margaret T., Bailey, Catherine B., Marsh, Verdell, Journal of Theory Construction and Testing


Abstract: Meta-analysis is a perspective of many techniques of measurement and statistical theories used in synthesizing findings from research studies. Various definitions of meta-analysis are presented. Uses and elements of meta-analysis are presented. Uses and elements of meta-analysis are described. This is a systematic approach to examine research, formulate hypotheses, conduct literature reviews, establish inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles, statistically synthesize and combine effect sizes from studies, search for moderating variables to explain effects, and report results. Computers have allowed meta-analysts to expand the technique and to develop programs specific for analyses. As with any method, efforts to reduce bias should be employed. The history and current status of the meta-analytic approach are described.

Key Words: meta-analysis, effect size, and homogeneity

Meta-Analysis Defined

Meta-analysis is a perspective of many techniques of measurement and statistical theories used in synthesiz ing findings from research studies. The term has come to encompass all methods and techniques of quantitative research synthesis. Meta-analysis is: (a) the statistical analysis of a collection of analyses that is used to integrate and summarize empirical findings that have resulted from existing studies (Glass, 1976); (b) a method designed to bring order to diverse and complex literatures by summarizing and synthesizing the findings of empirical studies (Maruyama, 1991); (c) a statistical tool for summarizing empirical results across studies to reach a quantitative generalization (Arthur, Bennett, & Huffcutt, 1994); (d) a body of statistical methods derived from the literature that is used for the purpose of drawing an omnibus conclusion based on summary information obtained from a collection of independent investigations (Proskin & Volpe, 1994); and (e) a method for systematically examining a body of research, carefully formulating hypotheses, conducting an exhaustive literature review, establishing inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles, recording and statistically synthesizing and combining data and effect sizes from the studies, searching for moderator/ mediator variables to explain effects, and reporting results ( Rosenthal & Dimatteo, 2001). As such, meta-analysis provides the investigator with a disciplined process of summarizing research findings with techniques that measure strengths of relationships that are more sophisticated than those used in qualitative reviews (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001).

Background

One of the earliest efforts of combining research results was introduced by Karl Pearson (1904), who reviewed studies on the effects of treatments for enteric fever in South Africa and India. In 1932, R.A. Fisher developed a method based on the product of (-values for obtaining an overall (-value. Glass (1976) coined the term, meta-analysis as an approach for summarizing quantitative research findings from individual studies. Shortly thereafter, the empirical case for summarizing studies was made with indications that narrative review procedures led to imprecise or inaccurate characterizations of cumulative research results (Cooper & Rosenthal, 1980). Glass, McGraw and Smith (1981) proposed a view of the summarization of research studies as a new application of analysis of variance and multiple regression procedures with study outcomes in the form of effect sizes, treated as the criterion variable and the features of studies, as the predictor variables. Cooper (1982) introduced the term "integrative review" to describe the application of a research process to analyze a collection of studies. As meta-analytical procedures became more popular and philosophy of science and conceptual issues were identified, methods for dealing with sampling error and biases were developed (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990; Rosenthal, 1991). By the year 2000, meta-analysis was an accepted method of scientific inquiry. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Meta-Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Scientific Inquiry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.