Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Hepatitis A among Montreal Street Youth

By Roy, Elise; Haley, Nancy et al. | Canadian Journal of Public Health, January/February 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Hepatitis A among Montreal Street Youth


Roy, Elise, Haley, Nancy, Leclerc, Pascale, Cedras, Lyne, et al., Canadian Journal of Public Health


ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of hepatitis A virus (HAS antibodies among Montreal street youth.

Method: Anti-HAV antibody testing was performed on blood samples from a hepatitis B and C study conducted among street youth in 1995-96.

Results: Among the 427 youth aged 14 to 25 years, prevalence of HAV antibodies was 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9%-7.2%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that birth in a country with a high anti-HAV prevalence (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 200.7; 95% CI: 38.1-1058.4), having had sexual partners) with history of unspecified hepatitis (AOR: 13.8; 95% Cl: 4.25.2), and insertive anal penetration (AOR: 5.1; 95% Cl: 1.6-16.7) were independently associated with infection.

Conclusion: Based on the relatively low HAV prevalence, the high prevalence of risk factors for infection, and the substantial hepatitis B and C prevalence, vaccination against hepatitis A is now actively promoted among Montreal street youth.

In countries with a low incidence of hepatitis A virus infection (HAS, outbreaks regularly occur among injecting drug users (IDUs) and homosexual men.1 In 1995-96, we conducted a study on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C among street youth in Montreal (hepatitis B: 9.2%; hepatitis C: 12.6%).2,3 Towards the end of the study, the Montreal Regional Public Health Department observed an outbreak of hepatitis A among gay men. Given the high proportion of male street youth having had sex with other men (15.5%) and the high proportion of IDUs (45.8%) among these youth,25 we decided to document the prevalence of hepatitis A among street youth. We conducted a secondary analysis, using blood samples left over from the hepatitis B and C study (youth involved had agreed on the consent form to analysis of leftover specimen).

The methods of this study have been described in detail in a previous publication.2 In brief, "street active" participants aged 14 to 25 years were recruited through the ongoing Montreal Street Youth Cohort Study.' Youth were considered 11 street active" if they had either been without a place to sleep more than once or had regularly used the services of Montreal street youth agencies during the previous year. The cohort study was approved by the Human Subjects (Ethics) Committee, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University.

All youth completed a 15-minute faceto-face questionnaire on socio-demographic characteristics and lifetime risk factors and gave a blood sample. Anti-HAV antibody testing using Roche Cobas Core anti-- HAV EIA (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) was conducted on samples from 427 study participants. This competitive test has a cut-off value of 140 mUI/ml.

The overall prevalence of HAV antibodies was 4.7% (20/427) with a 95% confidence interval of 2.9% to 7.2%. The prevalence did not vary significantly with sex (8.8% for women vs 5.1% for men, p=0.543), while HAV-seropositive subjects were older than seronegative ones (21.0 vs 19.4 years, p=0.007). Among other relevant results, we found that HAV prevalence was not associated with oro-genital intercourse or with injection drug use. The lifetime variables presenting the strongest association with HAV prevalence in univariate analyses were: birth in a country with a high anti-HAV prevalences (70.0% vs 3.1%, p<0.001); sexual activities with a person with a history of unspecified hepatitis (18.9% vs 3.4%, p=0.001), with a female prostitute (8.8% vs 3.2%, p=0.016), or with an HIV-infected person (17.4% vs 4.1%, p=0.020); having lived with someone (other than a sexual partner) infected with an unspecified hepatitis (13.2% vs 3.1%, p=0.002); and insertive anal penetration (11.1% vs 3.6%, p=0.018).

Table I presents the three factors independently associated with HAV infection in a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Our data indicated frequent co-infections.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Hepatitis A among Montreal Street Youth
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?