Labour-Management Partnerships: U.S. Evidence and Implications for Ireland

By McKersie, Robert B. | IBAR, January 1, 1996 | Go to article overview

Labour-Management Partnerships: U.S. Evidence and Implications for Ireland


McKersie, Robert B., IBAR


Introduction

For many years after publication of The Transformation of American Industrial Relations (Kochan, Katz & McKersie 1986), we observed only scant evidence that the transformation process, especially at the strategic level, was actually taking place. Finally, now, in the mid-1990s,a wide range of activities under the banner of labourmanagement, strategic partnerships can be seen, and they possess the potential to bring forth a new paradigm in employment relationships. Many examples in both the manufacturing and public sectors can be found in the United States, Britain, and Ireland, as well as other European countries.

Before getting too far into the subject, it is useful to attempt to define the scope of what is meant by a strategic partnership. A recent position paper prepared by a task force between the Communications, Energy and Paper (CEP) Union and Bell Canada defines the elements of a strategic partnership as follows:

[Union-management partnerships need to] involve, through the corporate steering committee and other exchanges of information, appropriate union executives in planning, strategy, training, and policy formulation in areas such as quality, human resources planning, new technology, major product and market changes, and strategic alliances with other telecommunications companies. These partnerships take place, for the most part, directly between labour and management - government as a player is generally not involved. Another key distinction is that these partnerships are at the corporate level where key business decisions are made that affect the viability of the enterprise. This is in line with the general decentralisation of collective bargaining that has occurred in Western countries from industry level down to enterprise level.

In the face of a natural reluctance by managers to share power, as well as a hesitancy on the part of many union leaders to move away from the traditional system wherein "management acts and the union reacts", we need to understand what has changed in the environment that is driving this important development. In addition, we need to understand the nature of the many, many dilemmas that the parties participating in these new arrangements are experiencing. The purpose of this paper is to explore these developments and challenges, using evidence from a number of partnerships, to demonstrate that this development is both robust and likely to expand.

The Explanation for the Emergence of Partnerships

One of the most prominent examples of labour-management partnerships in the United States is what has emerged in the integrated sector of the steel industry. Lynn Williams, former president of the United Steelworkers of America, explained recently (in January 1996), in an address to the Trade Union Programme at Harvard University, why he advocated a new strategy and bargained a series of contracts in 1993 with the major steel companies that embodied a comprehensive set of innovations. Basically, his premise was that with employment dropping precipitously and likely to drop even further as companies restructured, and as the character of the industry moved away from the dominance of large integrated operations and increasingly populated by mini-mills (largely non-union), the United Steelworkers Union and its members were going to lose out if ways were not found to participate at the strategic level as key business plans were formulated. Williams also recognised that the integrated sector needed to be more productive, and that such organisational innovations as teams, problem-solving groups, delegation of responsibility downward in the organization, and contingency compensation had to be implemented in the integrated sector (intensely organised by the United Steelworkers union). Otherwise, the union was not going to survive. The phrase that Williams likes to use is: "Managerial decisions are too important to be left just to executives". …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Labour-Management Partnerships: U.S. Evidence and Implications for Ireland
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.