Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

By Kumar, Ambika | Chicago Journal of International Law, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights


Kumar, Ambika, Chicago Journal of International Law


I. INTRODUCTION

According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ("ICCPR" or "Covenant"), "[e]veryone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression."1 Over 150 countries have ratified this agreement, but dozens have neither signed, ratified nor enforced it.2 In some of these countries, there are few strong free speech advocates. In others, free speech lobbies have failed for a variety of reasons-government officials may believe they already allow important speech to exist without punishment, struggle to draft or implement legislation given the ambiguous contours of free speech, or face strong anti-speech groups.

In light of these conditions, I suggest that advocates for liberal free speech rules, as laid out in Article 19 of the ICCPR, should look to their courts for solutions. Foremost, courts may be uniquely positioned to enforce the ICCPR by relying on its language and reading an inherent right to political speech into the constitutions of their respective governments. In addition, judges, who in many countries receive life tenure and guaranteed salaries, do not face the same political pressure as legislators. Finally, courts have traditionally been instrumental in guaranteeing individual freedoms that might be politically contentious or amorphously defined. Thus, using courts to regulate Article 19 rights serves both strategic and normative goals: judges are more likely to recognize free speech rights by relying on international law, and they are better fit to do so.

More specifically, I suggest that one country's growing experience with the enforcement of political speech guarantees-Australia's-serves as a useful case study to support these propositions. Free speech lobbies in Australia have failed. Instead, the nation's highest court, in accordance with international law, has recently recognized an implied right to political communication in its constitution, which itself contains no explicit individual guarantees. In doing so, albeit somewhat unintentionally, the High Court of Australia ("High Court") single-handedly brought Australia within the realm of ICCPR Article 19 compliance. With some qualifications, other nations can learn an important lesson from the Australian free speech experience, specifically as articulated by Justice Michael Kirby: courts may be particularly well suited to apply and enforce the ICCPR's core protections of speech. Part II reviews international free speech obligations under the ICCPR and countries' efforts to comply with them. Part III describes and analyzes Australia's struggle with judicial enforcement. Part IV argues that, as evidenced by this struggle, courts are particularly suited to enforce the free speech provisions of the ICCPR.

II. INTERNATIONAL FREE SPEECH NORMS

A. THE ICCPR: HISTORY AND APPLICATION

Pursuant to a mandate in the UN Charter, the UN Economic and Social Council created the Commission on Human Rights ("Commission") in 1946.3 As its first task, the Commission created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ("UDHR"), a document containing principles that many scholars now consider customary international law.4 However, the UDHR does not contain any enforcement or interpretive mechanisms, and it is not sufficiently specific to bind nations. Thus, the Commission created the ICCPR, a comprehensive accord embodying in more detail many rights enumerated in the UDHR.5 The ICCPR took effect ten years following its 1966 adoption,6 after the requisite number of nations ratified it.7

Under Article 19 of the ICCPR, individuals have the rights to hold and express opinions of all kinds.8 A more restrictive proposal at the time would have limited the freedoms to "political liberty" and contained more exceptions allowing the suspension of speech rights.9 To presently qualify as an exception, the restriction must be established by law and necessary to serve a listed purpose-either "the respect of the rights or reputations of others" or "the protection of national security or of public order. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.