Sneaking a Peek: How the New Auditing Standards on Risk Assessment May Affect Fraud Huddles

By Hayes, Arthur A. | The Journal of Government Financial Management, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview

Sneaking a Peek: How the New Auditing Standards on Risk Assessment May Affect Fraud Huddles


Hayes, Arthur A., The Journal of Government Financial Management


As noted at the conclusion of the previous article in this series (Summer 2006), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has recently promulgated a series of far-reaching auditing standards related to the independent auditor's responsibility to obtain an understanding of the entity's internal control, and assess risk as part of an audit of the entity's financial statements. Those standards, comprising a "suite" of Statements on Auditing Standards numbered 104 through 111, significantly change the auditor's responsibility for auditing internal controls and assessing risk and, by their application through auditors, the way audit clients should design, implement and maintain those controls.

The New Standards Include Requirements for Huddles

Paragraph 14 of SAS No. 109, Understanding the Entity and its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement, captioned "Discussion Among the Audit Team," provides that "the members of the audit team, including the auditor with final responsibility for the audit, should discuss the susceptibility of the entity's financial statements to material misstatements. This discussion could be held concurrently with the discussion among the audit team specified by SAS 99 to discuss the susceptibility of the entity's financial statements to fraud." (Emphasis added.)

What are the New Standards and How Do They Compare with the Fraud Huddle Requirements?

The new huddle standards are presented in paragraphs 14 through 20 of SAS 109, Understanding of the Entity and its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

Paragraph 14 was restated above, in the introduction of this article.

These new huddle requirements of SAS 109 are summarized and compared with the current huddle requirements of SAS 99 in Figure 1.

As noted in Figure 1, the huddle requirements of SAS 109 are not significantly different from those of SAS 99. The respective numbering of the huddle requirements in each standard is quite similar: paragraphs 14 through 20 in SAS 109 and paragraphs 14 through 18 in SAS 99. The two sets of requirements are complementary and, when combined, provide a very strong statement about how auditors should use the brainstorming sessions to better plan and execute their work. They are interlocked, not only by their similarities, but by the specific references to SAS 99 requirements in the SAS 109 huddle provisions.

Hence, it appears that the transition to the new huddle requirements in the internal control standards, taken by itself, should not pose serious challenges to the auditor. However, the other requirements of the new standards are probably a very different matter. Any set of standards of more than 200 pages, which contain the changes these standards do, is probably going to require a lot of retooling.

And the changes and effect are not limited to the auditors. In the commentary with the standards, the AICPA is quite blunt about the need to improve auditor performance relative to internal control. And, in light of the new standards' emphasis on holding clients more accountable for their risk assessments and their implementation of mitigating controls, there may be a significant effect on clients whose auditors have taken the path of maximizing control risk without taking findings on control weaknesses (reportable conditions, now known as significant deficiencies). And even if the auditor has been taking such findings, the additional emphasis on auditee risk assessments may lead to further findings in any case. The standards appear to be poised to close the door on serious loopholes that have probably contributed to the "expectation gap." Slamming that door might be painful. But at least we are better positioned to take hold of the doorknob and try.

So, How Does This Development Affect the First Huddles-the Ones Dictated by SAS 99?

Although auditors are not required to implement the standards until they are engaged in audits of financial statements that begin on or after December 15, 2006, earlier implementation is permitted. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sneaking a Peek: How the New Auditing Standards on Risk Assessment May Affect Fraud Huddles
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.