Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentence Bargaining

By Klein, Susan R. | Texas Law Review, June 2006 | Go to article overview

Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentence Bargaining


Klein, Susan R., Texas Law Review


Conventional wisdom in criminal procedure scholarship offered two competing models of the American criminal justice system, famously labeled by Professor Herbert Packer as the "Crime Control" and "Due Process" models.1 The Crime Control model posited "the efficient, expeditious, and reliable screening and dispositions of persons suspected of crime as the central value to be served by the criminal process."2 The Due Process model asserted that the truth-seeking function is "limited by and subordinate to the maintenance of the dignity and autonomy of the individual."3 Most criminal law casebooks began with a description of these models and asked the student to consider which direction the Court should head. These descriptions are now disappearing from the literature. The first reason is normative: we realize that neither model can be adopted without undesirable changes in constitutional precedent and executive functions, and neither would optimally serve the consensus goals of accuracy and equality. The second is practical: we realize that the American criminal justice system, like the civil system, would collapse if even a small percentage of suspects took advantage of these procedures and demanded trials.

The Due Process model ascended during the civil rights movement with the Warren Court revolution, due in large measure to the shameful treatment of African Americans in the southern states.4 This model has been eroded by various judicial and societal trends. First, as Professor Carol Steiker has written, the Burger and Rehnquist Courts steadily chipped away at the contours and enforcement of constitutional criminal procedural guarantees, denying the promise of procedures that would protect liberty and equality while ensuring the safety of the community through the conviction of guilty and dangerous criminals.5 Second, the erroneous public perception, fueled by politicians and the media, that violent crime has increased since the 1970s,6 has led to such a broadening of the scope of substantive criminal law that procedural protections have little force.7 With thousands of federal offenses to choose from,8 a determined prosecutor can generally locate some charge that will stick.9 Finally, the drug war has transformed a large percentage of our population, especially young African American males, into criminals, even though these perpetrators are primarily non-violent offenders who can be captured only through the most invasive investigative processes or interpretations of Fourth Amendment doctrine.10

However, neither did the law enforcement model of criminal procedure triumph. Serious flaws with those criminal procedures that concern accuracy11-especially the doctrines surrounding eyewitness identification,12 adequacy of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, provision of exculpatory information, and scientific and forensic testing13-have led to recently discovered wide-spread wrongful convictions of innocent persons.14 Erroneous convictions cannot be squared with the Crime Control model, as each wrongful conviction allows the guilty party to escape punishment and further endanger society. The coercive power of plea bargaining leaves us little data to determine what percentage of defendants pleading guilty actually are.15 Unequal treatment of criminal defendants based on wealth, race, ethnicity, geography, and gender plainly prevails,16 giving rise to social unrest (or at least misgivings), even among the middle class. Draconian mandatory minimum penalties, especially for drug offenses,17 challenge community notions of fairness, leading to a lack of respect for the system and arguably to a decrease in the deterrent and expressive force of the law.18 It is perhaps for these reasons that the current conservative Court has nonetheless recently expanded jury trial rights,19 strengthened the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause,20 contracted the class of defendants eligible for the death penalty,21 and reigned in prosecutorial control over sentencing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentence Bargaining
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.