Constitutional Test for Gender Discrimination in Public Facilities

By Kozlowski, James C. | Parks & Recreation, March 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Constitutional Test for Gender Discrimination in Public Facilities


Kozlowski, James C., Parks & Recreation


NRPA Law Review

The description of the Sullivan opinion contained herein resulted from my case research in response to an inquiry regarding alleged gender based discrimination in providing public athletic facilities. In this particular instance, the male leadership of a girls softball association in a metro county claimed that the county (in particular one county commissioner) was intentionally ignoring the construction of needed facilities in his geographical area because it would benefit female participation. According to the softball association, on several occasions, this elected commissioner had stated that he "just doesn't want any county park money spent to benefit the girls."

To counter such perceived genderbased discrimination, the softball association was looking for case examples that might clarify whether the law would indeed require gender equity in providing park and recreation facilities and programs. In particular, the inquiry referenced Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 as a legal basis for requiring gender equity in local park and recreation facilities.

Title IX, however, prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex "in education programs receiving Federal financial assistance." While athletics are considered an integral part of an institution's education program and are therefore covered by Title IX, this particular federal law would not necessarily apply to allegations of gender discrimination in the provision of county athletic facilities by a local park and recreation agency since this situation would not involve "education programs receiving Federal financial assistance."

However, as illustrated by the opinion of the federal circuit court in the case of Sullivan v. City of Cleveland Heights (6th Cir. 03/15/1989), such allegations of gender-based discrimination may give rise to a federal claim based upon the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. (Moreover, there may be state laws or local ordinances that prohibit gender discrimination in providing public programs and facilities.)

As stated in Sullivan, the 'proper standard for gender-based discrimination" is as follows: "To withstand constitutional challenge, previous cases establish that classifications by gender must serve important government objectives and must be substantially related to achievement of those objectives."

In Sullivan, the plaintiff alleged that the city imposed upon her an unconstitutional classification based on gender by affording her an unequal facility for changing clothes. The specific issue was, therefore, whether "Sullivan was accorded treatment by the City of Cleveland Heights unequal to that accorded her male counterparts.' If such unequal treatment existed, the court found that "the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment [to the U.S. Constitution] was violated unless the difference in the facilities bore a substantial relationship to an important governmental objective."

Similarly, applying these principles and reasoning to the allegations of gender discrimination by the women's softball association, the issue would be whether there is substantial evidence that "such unequal treatment existed" in the provision of athletic facilities for women in the county. If so, the county would have to show that "the difference in the facilities bore a substantial relationship to an important governmental objective" which would somehow justify unequal treatment between men and women.

Functionally Equivalent Facilities?

In Sullivan v. City of Cleveland Heights, 869 F2d 961 (6th Cir. 03/15/ 1989), plaintiff Kate Sullivan claimed her constitutional rights under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment were violated because the clothes-changing facilities that were made available for her at a public hockey arena were unequal to those provided for male hockey players. The facts of the case were as follows:

Kate Sullivan, 10-years old at the time of suit, was enrolled in the City of Cleveland Heights' hockey program.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Constitutional Test for Gender Discrimination in Public Facilities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?