Better Late Than Never: New York Finally Closes the "Gap" in Recovery Permitted for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Prenatal Medical Malpractice Cases

By Ellis, Alicia A. | St. John's Law Review, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

Better Late Than Never: New York Finally Closes the "Gap" in Recovery Permitted for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Prenatal Medical Malpractice Cases


Ellis, Alicia A., St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

New York courts, as well as courts in other states, have often been reluctant to allow recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress ("NIED"). This reluctance stems primarily from public policy concerns. Courts have voiced three main concerns about allowing recovery for NIED:

(1) the problem of permitting legal redress for harm that is often temporary and relatively trivial; (2) the danger that claims of mental harm will be falsified or imagined; and (3) the perceived unfairness of imposing heavy and disproportionate financial burdens upon a defendant, whose conduct was only negligent, for consequences which appear remote from the "wrongful" act.1

Despite these concerns, however, the ability of an injured party to "seek redress for every substantial wrong" has been fundamental to New York's common law system,2 as well as to tort law in general.3 For this reason, the courts have allowed recovery in certain situations, regardless of the opportunities for fraud and extra litigation.4 Though New York courts have taken this position in some situations, they have often denied recovery for NIED in situations where they have felt compelled to do so by public policy.5 Competing policy interests always underlie decisions in this area, as courts struggle to strike a just balance between compensating those injured through the fault of others, and keeping liability reasonably limited and the potential for fictitious suits at a minimum.6 Therefore, courts have struggled for years to determine under what circumstances recovery will be permitted, keeping in mind notions of fundamental fairness as well as the public policy interests of keeping liability and litigation within manageable bounds.7

One historically problematic area within NIED has been prenatal medical malpractice.8 Until recently, New York law in this area was fraught with inconsistencies concerning under what circumstances recovery would be permitted.9 Furthermore, the case law in New York left a "logical gap" in the recovery it permitted to mothers when prenatal medical malpractice injured their children.10

For decades, when medical malpractice resulted in the stillbirth or miscarriage of a child, the child's mother was only able to recover for her emotional injuries if she could demonstrate that she had also suffered an independent physical injury-one that was not considered to be a normal incident of childbirth.11 This rule was premised on the court's finding that the doctor in such a situation owed a duty of care to the fetus, but not to the mother.12 This was also the rule if a mother suffered emotional injuries due to her child being born alive but with severe birth defects due to her doctor's negligence.13 Demonstrating the existence of an independent physical injury was difficult, making recovery for NIED in this area rare.14 This rule proved to "fit[] uncomfortably into [New York's] tort jurisprudence."15

At the same time that this rule was in effect, a pregnant woman had a cause of action for NIED if her doctor erroneously advised her to undergo an abortion,16 or if her doctor negligently performed an abortion.17 Further, a child born alive, but with birth defects due to another's negligence, had his or her own cause of action against the tortfeasor.18 Finally, if an automobile operator, instead of a doctor, caused the stillbirth or miscarriage of a child, the child's mother had a cause of action for NIED.19 The state of law at this time, therefore, "engendered a peculiar result: it exposed medical caregivers to malpractice liability for in utero injuries when the fetus survived, but immunized them against any liability when their malpractice caused a miscarriage or stillbirth."20

This "gap" often resulted in unfair outcomes since it categorically denied recovery to certain deserving plaintiffs,21 even though allowing recovery would often be more aligned with fundamental notions of fairness. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Better Late Than Never: New York Finally Closes the "Gap" in Recovery Permitted for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Prenatal Medical Malpractice Cases
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.