Academic Performance Evaluation and the Organisation of Knowledge in the Research-Intensive University

By Kelly, Séamas; Murnane, Sinéad | Irish Journal of Management, January 1, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Academic Performance Evaluation and the Organisation of Knowledge in the Research-Intensive University

Kelly, Séamas, Murnane, Sinéad, Irish Journal of Management


Universities are widely acknowledged to play a key role in the development of advanced 'knowledge economies'1 and, as such, it is unsurprising that their structures and practices are coming under increasing public scrutiny. In his address to the Conference of Heads of Irish Universities (CHIU) conference on 'Irish Universities: The case for Reform' at University College Cork in November 2004, Michael Shattock, the rapporteur of the OECD Review of Higher Education in Ireland, argued that the system currently 'stands at a crossroads: unless reform is initiated now, higher education risks being marginalised by economic and knowledge-based drivers from the wider international society'. Of the recommendations listed in the OECD Review (2004), Shattock placed particular emphasis on the development of a research culture and internal institutional reform of Irish universities.

The OECD are not the first to argue for the need for reform (see, for example, Skilbeck, 2001), and the recently changed programmes at UCD, Trinity, UCC and NUIG illustrate the extent of the appetite for change within the Department of Education and amongst senior university administrators. In this paper, while we do not question the view that Irish universities may be urgently in need of reform, we do raise a number of concerns about the rationale underpinning key features of the change discourse and the substantive nature of some of the reforms being introduced. In particular, we focus on one aspect of these changes, namely the notion of academic performance evaluation. Drawing on a field study of the implementation of a new Senior Lecturer promotion system at UCD, we argue that while the system is, in many ways, a welcome alternative to that which preceded it, the rationale underpinning it is based on a dangerously superficial view of the nature of knowledge production in a university environment. As such, it risks indirectly promoting perverse forms of behaviour amongst academics seeking promotion. Consequently, we argue for the importance of taking recent epistemological shifts in management/organisation studies seriously (see also Kelly, 2005), by endeavouring to speak about 'knowledge' and its 'production' in more sophisticated ways. In short, we need to Open up the black box' (Latour, 1999) of academic knowledge production to explore its complexity and diversity.

The paper is structured as follows. In section 2, we draw on recent 'praxiological' perspectives on learning/knowing, and on Foucault's (1980) ideas on power/knowledge, to offer a brief critique of traditional, abstract and disembodied conceptions of knowledge and to argue that a diversity of different knowledge production practices co-exist in universities. We then move on, in sections 3 and 4, to describe an exploratory piece of interpretive field research on the introduction of a new academic performance evaluation system in UCD. Finally, we briefly discuss key elements of this case and their implications for the management and organisation of academic knowledge production.


In recent years, the development of theories of situated practice/learning (c.f. Suchman, 1987; Lave and Wenger, 1991; Chaiklin and Lave, 1996; Wenger, 1998) have problematised the notion of knowledge as an abstract, disembodied entity. Instead, writers in this tradition argue for a much more holistic, embodied and situated approach to understanding human learning that would reject dualisms between mind/body and theory/practice. From this perspective, all knowledge and learning is based on an active and ongoing participation in communal social practices, thus problematising the notion of explicit, objective, de-contextualised information/ knowledge. Writers in this tradition reject 'cognitivist'2 conceptualisations of human learning, and argue for a much more holistic, embodied and situated or contingent approach to understanding this process (see the introductory chapter in Chaiklin and Lave, 1996).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Academic Performance Evaluation and the Organisation of Knowledge in the Research-Intensive University


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?