Fulfilling the Promise of the National Labor Relations Act: A Review of Taking Back the Workers' Law
Hodges, Ann C., Labor Law Journal
FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT: A REVIEW OF TAKING BACK THE WORKERS' LAW
Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital and deserves much the higher consideration.1
Ellen Dannin's excellent book, Taking Back the Workers Law, reminds us of the importance of labor as reflected in the enactment of the National Labor Relations Act in 1935. In these days when private sector union membership has declined to the single digits,2 this is a timely reminder. Of course, scholars and unionists have bemoaned this decline for years, ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Fulfilling the Promise of the National Labor Relations Act: A Review of Taking Back the Workers' Law.
Contributors: Hodges, Ann C. - Author.
Journal title: Labor Law Journal.
Volume: 57.
Issue: 3
Publication date: Fall 2006.
Page number: 176+.
© CCH Incorporated: Health & Human Resources Fall 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset