The National Health Survey 2001: Usefulness to Inform a Discussion on Access to and Use of Quality Primary Health Care Using Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as an Example

By Comino, Elizabeth J.; Harris, Mark F. et al. | Australian Health Review, November 2006 | Go to article overview

The National Health Survey 2001: Usefulness to Inform a Discussion on Access to and Use of Quality Primary Health Care Using Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as an Example


Comino, Elizabeth J., Harris, Mark F., Harris, Elizabeth, Davies, Gawaine Powell, et al., Australian Health Review


Abstract

Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example.

Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of quality diabetes care were investigated (diagnosis, preventive pharmacotherapy, complication screening, multidisciplinary care and hospitalisation), and their association with various factors including socioeconomic and diabetes-related health status was assessed.

Results: Older Australian-born females were more likely to receive preventive pharmacotherapy, whereas complication screening was associated with duration of disease. Multidisciplinary care was associated with recent hospitalisation and not health need assessed by presence of comorbidity.

Conclusions: This novel use of the 2001 NHS provided information on patterns of access to and use of diabetes-related PHC that were consistent with previous research. It suggests a new role for survey data in monitoring access to and use of PHC over time and complementing other population health data collections in this area.

Aust Health Rev 2006: 30(4): 496-506

IN A PREVIOUS PAPER we proposed a conceptual framework for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) using population health surveys, and with type 2 diabetes as an example.1 This enabled us to draw on extensive research evidence, published management guidelines, and the 2005 National Diabetes Strategy Indicator Project to propose a number of domains of care that could be implemented in the PHC setting.2-6 These domains are considered to be consistent with quality care for people with diabetes. Using this approach and despite the limitations of the information that is currently sought, we identified potential indicators of access to and use of quality PHC that were available in the 2001 National Health Survey (2001 NHS) data.7 The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of these data to explore the utility of this approach. Firstly, we describe the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its risk factors, and examine factors associated with increased prevalence. Next we examine indicators of socioeconomic differentials reported by participants; and, finally, we examine those social determinants that are associated with our proposed indicators of access to quality PHC.

Methods

The 2001 NHS was an Australian population-based survey comprising one randomly selected adult from each of 17 918 private dwellings using multistage area sampling techniques.7 Our analyses include only participants aged 45 years or more. Participants responses to two specific questions (Have you ever been told by a doctor or nurse that you have: diabetes? or high sugar levels in your blood or urine? or neither? What type of diabetes were you told you have?) were used to identify participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The 2001 NHS assessed five of seven proposed domains of access to "quality" PHC for people with diabetes:

* Detection of diabetes and risk factors for diabetes: based on self-report of diabetes or of risk factors (obesity and physical inactivity)

* Proactive PHC: self-report of anti-hypertensive or lipid-lowering medication use (preventive pharmacotherapy)

* Complication screening: self-report of an eye check in the last 2 years

* Multidisciplinary care: self-report of seeing a general practitioner and a dietitian, podiatrist, or nurse during the last 2 weeks.

* Hospitalisation: based on self-report of hospitalisation during the last 12 months.

The first of these domains is used to calculate prevalence in the total sample. Data for the remaining domains, presented for those participants reporting diabetes, are regarded as potential indicators of access to and use of quality PHC. Two domains (prevention of diabetes and monitoring of symptom control) are not included in this paper. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The National Health Survey 2001: Usefulness to Inform a Discussion on Access to and Use of Quality Primary Health Care Using Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as an Example
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.