Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are

By DeClue, Gregory | Journal of Psychiatry & Law, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are

DeClue, Gregory, Journal of Psychiatry & Law

Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are, by Frans de Waal (New York, NY: Riverhead/Penguin, 2005), 274 pp., $24.95.

At the 2005 annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Frans de Waal received an award from the American Psychological Foundation and delivered a presentation on the subject matter of this book. The talk was intriguing, as is the book. De Waal is a keen observer and integrator. In reading the book we learn commonalities and differences among the apes, including orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos (the two species most genetically similar to humans), and humans.

De Waal draws heavily on naturalistic observations of apes (including humans) in the wild and in captivity. He tells us how various primates deal with power, sex, violence, kindness, and cooperation. Among the lessons is that apes are social creatures; it is necessary to understand the social context in order to understand our behavior. Apes regularly experience empathy and will spontaneously help not only their kin, but others, including other species.

Bonobos are as closely related to humans as chimpanzees. Popular conceptions of apes -and by extension, primitive aspects of humans -are largely drawn from chimpanzees. Bonobos have different behavioral and cultural patterns than chimpanzees. Bonobo groups are matrilineal, are led by an alpha female and a group of largely cooperative females, and typically resolve conflict via cooperation, often including sexual behavior to reduce tension and promote cooperation. Understanding of bonobo behavior and culture, as well as that of chimpanzees and other apes, helps to illuminate human behavior: "Being both more systematically brutal than chimps and more empathie than bonobos, we are by far the most bipolar ape. Our societies are never completely peaceful, never completely competitive, never ruled by sheer selfishness, and never perfectly moral" (p. 221).

Some aspects of human behavior that are often thought of as arising after language and being uniquely human are clearly present in other primates. An example is morality, which de Waal summarizes as the two H's, Helping and (not) Hurting. He describes how a group of chimpanzees responded after two adolescents made everyone late for dinner, and then integrates that with other ape behavior. "Having or not having [resources], appropriating, stealing, reciprocity, fairness: All have to do with the division of resources, a top concern of human morality" (p. 192). Morality is clearly present in nonhuman apes, and is therefore not dependent on language and cultural factors such as religion.

De Waal notes that, by the age of two, humans "distinguish between moral principles ('do not steal') and cultural norms ('no pajamas at school'). They realize that breaking some rules harms others, but breaking other rules just violates expectations" (p. 192). De Waal's broad perspective, drawn from observations across primate species and across cultures within a single primate species, provides a useful framework as we consider such behavior as authorities in the United States arresting a woman for breast feeding in a shopping mall, or Europeans' concern about a person's decision to keep a gun at his or her house.

Trying de Waal's perspective on, I now consider whether purported moral rules pass the test. Is this about the interconnected moral principles of do Help others and do not Hurt others, or is this merely about cultural expectations like no pajamas at school?

De Waal's observations and analysis lead to an understanding that "our noblest achievement-morality -has evolutionary ties to our basest behavior-warfare" (p. 212). "In the course of human evolution, out-group hostility enhanced in-group solidarity to the point that morality emerged" (p. 212).

De Waal considers and rejects the old Roman proverb "Homo homini lupus" (man is wolf to man). De Waal shows that the proverb misrepresents and insults wolves, humans, and other mammals: "One can't reap the benefits of group life without contributing to it.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?