Bridging the Gap between Collaborative and Realist Evaluation: A General Critique and Case Study of European Union Employment Policies

By Carpenter, Mick | International Journal of Action Research, December 31, 2005 | Go to article overview

Bridging the Gap between Collaborative and Realist Evaluation: A General Critique and Case Study of European Union Employment Policies


Carpenter, Mick, International Journal of Action Research


After first establishing the need for a reflexive approach to evaluation, the article focuses on the theoretical breakthrough of the 'fourth generation' evaluation paradigm proposed by Guba and Lincoln (1989). This is seen as having much to offer, but their stakeholder focused approach has the danger of lapsing into relativism. Therefore a 'realist' approach is proposed building on Pawson and Tilley (1997), going beyond deconstruction of stakeholder perspectives to make verifiable statements about programme and project effects. This is then worked through with an outline review of the issues associated with evaluating European Union Employment Strategies. The article concludes by suggesting that a realist concern for critical praxis in evaluation can also bring it closer to action research paradigms.

Keywords: Evaluation, realism, employment, European Union

1. Introduction

The purpose of this paper is sympathetically to analyse emerging critical traditions in evaluation and find ways of bridging collaborative and 'realist' traditions, working through the concrete example of European employment programmes. I argue that while evaluation should always start with the perceptions and understandings of stakeholders, the evaluator necessarily has an independent role in assessing which have greater plausibility rather than simply stop at synthesising different accounts. This is because there is the need to allow for the possibility of contradictory or irreconcilable meanings, and also because 'deeper' causal processes may lie at a level not easily accessible to local actors. Thus while evaluation rightly has a pragmatic concern with improving programmes and/or organisations, and helping stakeholders listen and respond to each other, it should not abandon a fundamental concern with uncovering causal processes. 'Realist' approaches, which incorporate social meanings and processes into the causal analysis of change, can help to provide a 'middle way' between extremes of social constructionism and positivism. While the elitist tendencies of objectivist evaluations might be acknowledged, and a preference for participative evaluation from below asserted, there is no need to throw out the scientific baby with the positivist bathwater. In other words, while I sympathise with collaborative evaluation's efforts to bridge gaps between internal actors and external judges, evaluators bring something to different to the table and need to be more than non-judgemental project conciliators.

These reflections arise from evaluative research funded from the European Social Fund (ESF) EQUAL programme undertaken as part of the Great Britain wide SEQUAL project aimed at identifying good practice in integrating excluded and discriminated groups into the labour market. It also arises from discussions held within the evaluation sub-group of SEQUAL's transnational partners in FACETS, which sought to develop cross-national learning about labour market integration of migrants and ethnic minorities (for information on SEQUAL and FACETS see http://www.surrey.ac.uk/politics/ cse/sequal.htm). The first part of the article seeks to address general issues, and these are then applied in outline to the specific context of the European Union's employment policies.

2. Deconstruction and beyond

At a time when a pragmatic and rather mechanical concern with 'what works' has increasingly come to dominate public policy, seeking to utilise evaluation as a set of depoliticised technologies for evidence based public policy (see for example, Davies/Nutley/Smith 2000), it is necessary to assert explicitly the political and critical nature of evaluation as a reflexive activity (Taylor/Balloch 2005). The advantage of the constructivist tradition to evaluation is that it brings the political nature of evaluation to the fore and leads to a critical questioning of the way that ideological purposes are incorporated within evaluation strategies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bridging the Gap between Collaborative and Realist Evaluation: A General Critique and Case Study of European Union Employment Policies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.