Psychotherapy Research at the Start of the 21st Century: The Persistence of the Art versus Science Controversy
Joyce, Anthony S., Wolfaardt, Ulrich, Sribney, Christine, Aylwin, A. Scott, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
This article offers an overview of prominent general trends in the field of psychotherapy research. We consider 3 areas of the literature: metaanalytic reviews addressing the effectiveness of psychotherapy, the movement to identify empirically supported treatments (EST), and research on the "common factor" or "contextual" models of psychotherapy. We present narrative reviews of selected literature associated with each area. The reviews highlight several issues currently confronting the field. Metaanalytic reviews underscore 2 conclusions: psychotherapy is superior to the absence of treatment, and different approaches to psychotherapy yield equivalent effects. In counterpoint to these ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Psychotherapy Research at the Start of the 21st Century: The Persistence of the Art versus Science Controversy.
Contributors: Joyce, Anthony S. - Author, Wolfaardt, Ulrich - Author, Sribney, Christine - Author, Aylwin, A. Scott - Author.
Journal title: Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.
Volume: 51.
Issue: 13
Publication date: November 2006.
Page number: 797+.
© Canadian Psychiatric Association Feb 2009.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset