The Winding Course of the Massachusetts Burma Law: Subfederal Sanctions in a Historical Context

By Moritsugu, Erika | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Winding Course of the Massachusetts Burma Law: Subfederal Sanctions in a Historical Context


Moritsugu, Erika, The George Washington International Law Review


INTRODUCTION

For centuries, American states have been on the vanguard of human rights activism. Since the prohibition of the slave trade in the 1800s, it has been the practice of states to adopt legislation reflecting the moral impetus of its citizens. Through economic boycotts and other forms of activism, states and municipalities have conveyed the sentiments of its citizens dating back to the Boston Tea Party. Similarly, in the 1980s, state and local activism calling for an end of the white minority's national policy of racial separatism and subjugation of the black majority in South Africa preceded the transformation of the apartheid regime in Pretoria.

Following this distinguished legacy, the public spotlight has trained its eye on human rights abuses committed by the Burmese1 military junta, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC). IMAGE FORMULA9

In 1988, the SPDC, under its more ominous name "SLORC,"2 engaged in a violent crackdown against the Burmese pro-democracy movement. In 1989, the SLORC imprisoned the leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD), Nobel Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi.3 Similarly, in 1990, the SLORC suppressed the results of free elections, which they resoundingly lost to the NLD, and they have continued their authoritarian rule ever since.4

Prominent human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Free Burma Network have generated ongoing publicity and public condemnation of the SPDC's violent suppression of democracy in Burma, as well as widespread labor abuses and racial and religious persecution.5 In response, there has been an intensifying call by U.S. national and subfederal governments as well as international organizations for the Burmese military government to democratize and respect basic human rights.6 Utilizing a diverse, often uncoordinated, and sometimes inconsistent,7 combination of diplomatic measures, including the withdrawal of economic aid and financial support to Burma, national governments and international organizations have attempted to pressure the SPDC into reform.8 In the United States, for example, President Clinton imposed U.S. unilateral economic sanctions on Burma, which have remained in place since 1997.9 Additionally, U.S. municipal governments introduced and IMAGE FORMULA10

enacted their own sanctions, including a 1996 Massachusetts law that imposed sanctions on companies doing business in Burma.10

Despite an environment of activism and heightened public awareness of the human rights abuses in Burma, a suit brought by U.S. businesses challenging the constitutionality of the Massachusetts sanctions met with success in the lower federal courts.11 In a case capturing all elements of competing constitutional values-- federalism, supremacy, policy values, the international human rights movement, and free trade-the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, finding the Massachusetts sanctions unconstitutional.12

Proponents of the sanctions argued that their right to free speech and states' rights,13 combined with their humanitarian motives, should prevail over the Constitutional constraints that might otherwise limit the role states may undertake in foreign policy matters.14 Further, they argued that the subfederal South African anti-apartheid sanctions, the model for the Massachusetts Burma sanctions, prompted the enactment of the federal and multilateral sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa,just as the Massachusetts Burma Law preceded federal sanctions by three months.15 Indeed, as Justice Brandeis proclaimed in his famous Ice House dissent of 1932, "[i] t is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country."16 IMAGE FORMULA12

Recent developments in U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Winding Course of the Massachusetts Burma Law: Subfederal Sanctions in a Historical Context
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.