Steps Forward, Steps Back on Judicial Ethics

Judicature, November/December 2006 | Go to article overview

Steps Forward, Steps Back on Judicial Ethics


The proposed revisions to the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct go far toward ensuring public confidence in the judiciary, but some rules need to go further.

After over three years of review, the American Bar Association Joint Commission to Evaluate the Model Code of Judicial Conduct has released a final report proposing both format and substantive changes to the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct. The ABA House of Delegates will consider the report and recommendations at its February 2007 meeting. (The Joint Commission was appointed by and operated under the auspices of the ABA Standing Committees on Ethics and Professional Responsibility and on Judicial Independence.)

The Joint Commission was commendably transparent in its proceedings, including advisors from other organizations (such as AJS) in its deliberations, for example. It also held public hearings at which it took testimony, created a listserv for individuals who wanted to keep informed of its progress, posted drafts of portions of the code on its web-site, and solicited and considered comments. According to its final report, 39 entities and approximately 300 individuals filed commerits with the Joint Commission on the existing model code (last revised in 1990), a preliminary report distributed in June 2005, or a proposed final draft in December 2005. The final report, previous drafts, and comments can be found at www.abanet.org/judicialethics.

The results of all that hard work are obvious in the important strides the proposed revisions make in clarifying the ethical obligations of judges, filling in some of the gaps in the former versions, and reflecting recent developments. The report, for example, responds to the increase in individuals representing themselves in court by explaining that judges may make "reasonable accommodations to ensure pro se litigants the opportunity to have their matters fairly heard" without violating the principle of judicial impartiality. Similarly, the proposed draft indicates that judges serving on therapeutic or problem-solving courts "may assume a more interactive role with parties, treatment providers, probation officers, social workers, and others" as authorized by law.

The Joint Commission recommendations include strengthening the prohibition on biased conduct by adding ethnicity, marital status, gender, and political affiliation to the code's list of improper bases for discrimination and prohibiting "harassment" in the black letter rules with explanatory comment that describes both harassment generally and sexual harassment. Further, the categories of gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation have been added to the list of factors upon which discrimination is prohibited in the policies of clubs to which judges seek to belong.

The final report also includes an explicit requirement that judges "cooperate and be candid and honest with judicial and lawyer discipline agencies," without "retaliatfing], directly or indirectly, against anyone known or suspected to have assisted or cooperated with an investigation of a judge." The Joint Commission has drafted a new rule to encourage the judiciary to face the issue of impaired judges and lawyers by requiring a judge "having a reasonable belief that the performance of a lawyer or another judge is impaired by drugs or alcohol, or by a mental, emotional, or physical condition" to "take appropriate action, which may include a confidential referral to a lawyer or judicial assistance program." Further, the final report adds an important rule prohibiting a judge, when engaging in extrajudicial activities, from using "court premises, staff, stationery, equipment, or other resources, except for incidental use for activities that concern the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, or unless such additional use is permitted by law."

The Joint Commission also held the ground against arguments that restrictions on judges' political conduct cannot be justified after Republican Party of Minnesota v.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Steps Forward, Steps Back on Judicial Ethics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.