Biosecurity, Diseases, and Invasive Species: Implications of Bioterrorism for Agriculture: Discussion of Elbakidze and McCarl and Pierre, Spreen, and Moss

By Hahn, William F. | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, August 2006 | Go to article overview

Biosecurity, Diseases, and Invasive Species: Implications of Bioterrorism for Agriculture: Discussion of Elbakidze and McCarl and Pierre, Spreen, and Moss


Hahn, William F., Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


Exotic and invasive species and bioterrorism are of increasing concern for U.S. policy makers. The economic analysis of these issues, especially bioterrorism, is a fast-growing, relatively new area. It is an area where an economist can provide important input into both policy and applied theory. The two papers in this section address invasive species issues.

In the exotic species literature, one often sees control strategies divided into five levels. The first level of control is prevention, which includes those activities designed to prevent the introduction of exotic species into an ecosystem. The next level is detection and monitoring; this includes finding those species that get past the prevention measures, then discovering the range they inhabit, their population density, and how these are changing over time. Detection of an invasive species then triggers either eradication, the elimination of the species, control, which is generally taken to mean making the population density and/or area affected as small as possible; or, if control fails, adaptation. Eradication is the preferred option for dealing with exotic species outbreaks when feasible and cost effective.

Both of these papers focus on the trade-offs between monitoring and eradication costs, looking at a specific exotic species in a specific U.S. state. Elbakidze and McCarl look at Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in Texas; Pierre, Spreen, and Moss examine the effects of the Mediterranean fruit fly in Florida. Both sets of researchers use a stochastic, dynamic programming approach in modeling the species. They also benefit in focusing on specific species because we know what kind of technology works to eradicate these species. (We also know that these species can be eradicated; they have been successfully eradicated from the United States and other countries.) Both papers are motivated by the insight that monitoring and other preoutbreak investments can reduce the costs of eliminating an exotic species if an outbreak occurs. Monitoring by itself may allow us to catch exotics sooner, before they have a chance to spread over a wide area. Also, as Elbakidze and McCarl point out, preoutbreak investments in eradication or control can increase the effectiveness and reduce the costs of efforts in dealing with invasive outbreaks.

FMD and Mediterranean fruit flies are both controlled partly by quarantines of the infected areas. Mediterranean fruit flies are to some degree self-propelled, but can spread more rapidly in infected produce. FMD can travel in infected animals and their meat and be carried by humans, other animals, or equipment that comes in contact with infected animals. The largest part of the costs of dealing with an outbreak of either species is the disruption in trade. FMD is particularly serious because an outbreak anywhere in the United States would effectively eliminate U.S. exports of red meats for several months. The infected parts of Texas would be quarantined from the rest of the United States as well. A Mediterranean fruit fly outbreak could prevent shipments of Florida produce out of the state. Neither of these studies accounts for the costs of lost markets, which is not, in my opinion, a serious flaw. Neither claims to be a complete analysis of their pest. Both focus on the trade-off between monitoring and eradication costs. The tradedisrupting effects of these species are the reasons why we will eradicate any outbreaks. I would assign the costs of lost markets to the failures of the prevention programs. A complete analysis of either species would include linking the monitoring and eradication costs with the prevention costs.

FMD in Texas

I start with Elbakidze and McCarl. Their discussion of the pre- and postoutbreak costs and decision making is excellent. I also like the fact that they start with a simple, theoretical model showing the optimal trade-offs between pre- and postoutbreak activities. Their basic model is a type of dynamic, stochastic programming model with two levels of decisions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Biosecurity, Diseases, and Invasive Species: Implications of Bioterrorism for Agriculture: Discussion of Elbakidze and McCarl and Pierre, Spreen, and Moss
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.