Dissociating Viewpoint Costs in Mental Rotation and Object Recognition

By Hayward, William G.; Zhou, Guomei et al. | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2006 | Go to article overview

Dissociating Viewpoint Costs in Mental Rotation and Object Recognition


Hayward, William G., Zhou, Guomei, Gauthier, Isabel, Harris, Irina M., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


In a mental rotation task, participants must determine whether two stimuli match when one undergoes a rotation in 3-D space relative to the other. The key evidence for mental rotation is the finding of a linear increase in response times as objects are rotated farther apart. This signature increase in response times is also found in recognition of rotated objects, which has led many theorists to postulate mental rotation as a key transformational procedure in object recognition. We compared mental rotation and object recognition in tasks that used the same stimuli and presentation conditions and found that, whereas mental rotation costs increased relatively linearly with rotation, object recognition costs increased only over small rotations. Taken in conjunction with a recent brain imaging study, this dissociation in behavioral performance suggests that object recognition is based on matching of image features rather than on 3-D mental transformations.

Starting from the early 1970s, Shepard and colleagues (Shepard & Cooper, 1982; Shepard & Judd, 1976; Shepard & Metzler, 1971 ) conducted a series of experiments showing that mental transformations of 2-D shapes and 3-D objects appeared to follow the same laws as physical transformations of real objects. This finding of mental rotation was a cornerstone in the foundations of the emerging field of cognitive science, since it showed that the physical world constrains internal mental representations. The typical mental rotation task is one in which participants are asked to determine whether two stimuli are identical or mirror reflections (i.e., differing in handedness); the difficulty lies in the fact that the stimuli are rotated relative to each other. The hallmark of mental rotation is that response times form a linear function of orientation difference between the two stimuli.

Whereas mental rotation tasks require a discrimination between mirror images of the same object across viewpoints, studies of object recognition often involve discriminations among different objects across viewpoints. Many object recognition studies have found results similar to those of mental rotation studies, with recognition judgments becoming slower (thus, more difficult) as an object is rotated away from a studied viewpoint (e.g., Hayward & Williams, 2000; Jolicoeur, 1985; Tarr & Pinker, 1989;Tarr, Williams, Hayward, & Gauthier, 1998). Mental rotation has often been invoked to account for these effects (see, e.g., Jolicoeur, 1990; Tarr & Pinker, 1989). According to these theories, objects are represented at specific viewpoints; when encountered from a novel view, the perceived stimulus is mentally rotated until it matches a stored view, at which point the recognition decision can be made.

In recent years, however, a number of studies have contested the view that rotated object recognition relies on mental rotation, both on theoretical grounds (e.g., Corballis, 1988) and from empirical evidence. For example, Lawson and Jolicoeur (2003) showed that viewpoint costs for objects rotated in the picture plane contained nonlinearities that cannot be accommodated by mental rotation. Willems and Wagemans (2001) tested recognition of misoriented objects rotated around a number of different axes; they found no effect of axis on performance, even though an explicit mental rotation task showed large differences. Jolicoeur, Corballis, and Lawson (1998) rotated objects in the picture plane and had participants either identify the object (object recognition) or say whether it would face left or right in an upright orientation (mental rotation). They found that perceived or actual rotation of the object affected mental rotation but not object recognition, again casting doubt on a common mechanism for both tasks. De Caro and Reeves (2000) examined naming and orientation judgments for misoriented objects that were backward masked; orientation judgments showed roughly linear viewpoint costs, but naming judgments showed costs that asymptoted past 60° rotations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dissociating Viewpoint Costs in Mental Rotation and Object Recognition
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.