Redundant Visual Signals Boost Saccade Execution

By Turatto, Massimo; Betta, Elena | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Redundant Visual Signals Boost Saccade Execution


Turatto, Massimo, Betta, Elena, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


The redundant signal effect (RSE) refers to the fact that human beings react more quickly to a pair of stimuli than to only one stimulus. In previous studies of the RSE in the oculomotor system, bimodal signals have been used as the goal of the saccade. In consistency with studies using manual response times (RTs), saccadic RTs have been shown to be shorter for redundant multimodal stimuli than for single unimodal stimuli. In the present experiments, we extended these findings by demonstrating an RSE in the saccadic system elicited only by unimodal visual stimuli. In addition, we found that shorter saccadic RTs were accompanied by an increased saccadic peak velocity. The present results are of relevance for neurophysiological models of saccade execution, since the boost of saccades was elicited by two visual transients (acting as a "go" signal) that were presented not at the goal of the saccade but at various other locations.

When required to respond manually as quickly as possible to a stimulus onset, the human being delivers a faster response when two stimuli are presented than when only one is presented. This phenomenon is known as the redundant signal effect (RSE; Todd, 1912). The response time (RT) advantage observed in the double-signal over the single-signal condition is also called redundancy gain, and has been documented for stimuli delivered in the same mode and in different modalities (see, e.g., Miller, 1982, 1986; Mordkoff & Yantis, 1991). The redundancy gain can be explained according to either statistical facilitation (Raab, 1962) or neural coactivation (Miller, 1982), with the former postulating a horse race between stimuli for response activation and the latter hypothesizing that stimuli are pooled together before the response is emitted. To distinguish between these two possibilities, Miller (1982) devised a mathematical method known as the horse-race inequality. If the inequality is not violated, probability summation is sufficient to explain the redundancy gain; in contrast, if a violation is observed, some sort of neural coactivation should be assumed to have occurred.

Although most of the RSE studies have recorded manual RTs (Miller & Reynolds, 2003), a few have addressed the RSE using saccadic responses (Arndt & Colonius, 2003; Colonius & Arndt, 2001; Hughes, Reuter-Lorenz, Nozawa, & Fendrich, 1994). Notably, whereas manual RT studies have demonstrated the redundancy gain for both visual and multimodal stimuli, in those in which saccadic RTs were recorded only multimodal stimuli were used. Typically, in the latter studies the redundant signal condition consists of auditory and visual stimuli presented together at the same location (corresponding to the saccadic goal), whereas the single-signal condition consists of a unimodal stimulus. The results consistently showed shorter saccadic latencies on double- than on single-signal trials (see, e.g., Hughes et al., 1994).

Quite surprisingly, what has remained unexplored is whether or not redundant unimodal visual stimuli can produce an RSE in saccadic RTs. Hence, the aim of the present study was to address whether or not the execution of a visually guided endogenous saccade toward a prespecified target can be speeded up by a "go" signal consisting of two visual transients instead of only one, with the visual transients appearing at nontarget locations.

EXPERIMENT 1

The only evidence that unimodal visual stimuli can elicit an RSE comes from studies in which manual RTs were recorded (see, e.g., Miller, 2004; Miller & Reynolds, 2003). In these studies, the participants' task was to press a button as soon as they detected the occurrence of a visual transient ("go" signal). Note that the motor response in this task is not directed toward the "go" signal. Hence, to determine whether or not unimodal visual stimuli can elicit an RSE in the oculomotor system, we presented visual transients that did not coincide with the saccadic goal.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Redundant Visual Signals Boost Saccade Execution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?