Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua

By Schak, David C. | The China Journal, January 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua


Schak, David C., The China Journal


Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua, edited by John Makeham and A-Chin Hsiau. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005. vi + 287 pp. £35.00 (hardcover).

This is a very informative, well-written book which analyzes the bentuhua phenomenon in Taiwan, translated variously as nativization, indigenization, localization or, as Bruce Jacobs prefers for this particular volume, Taiwanization. From the late 1940s to the late 1980s, the authoritarian KMT government denied Han Taiwanese, who had migrated during or prior to the Japanese colonial period, their local cultural identity. While Bentuhua can refer to attempts to resist threats to Chinese identity coming from overseas influences, in Taiwan it often refers to a process of de-Sinification, "an attempt to remove the yoke of 'Chinese' colonial hegemony so that Taiwan's putative native (bentu) identity can be recognized and further nurtured" (Makeham, p. 188), or "a generalized notion that the uniqueness of Taiwanese society/culture/history must be appreciated and interpreted from the viewpoint of the Taiwanese people per se ... " (Hsiau, p. 125). Literature scholars see this as beginning with the rise in Taiwan's rural social realist literature (xiangtu wenxue) movement in the 1970s, but it has been much stronger since democratization.

The first two chapters deal with politics. J. Bruce Jacobs traces political changes associated with the rise of the non-Party (dangwai) group to the 2004 elections. Although it was often couched in terms of Taiwanese vs. Mainlanders, he argues that the thrust of non-Party politics has been much more about democratization than ethnic issues. Indeed, the major Mainlander parties of the 1990s, the KMT and the New Party, both had considerable support from Taiwanese. That said, the political changes of the 1980s and 1990s greatly increased Taiwan consciousness.

Fu-chang Wang looks at the Education Minister's 1989 decision to revise school textbooks, reversing the neglect of Taiwan content. Initially the change was "accepted without controversy" (p. 56), but the imminent release of the texts in 1997 met with two months of serious protests. Wang explains that the democratization politics process that occurred during the interim reversed the Mainlander-Taiwanese dominance in government and produced a lot of bad blood between the two groups in the process. Moreover, what Wang refers to as the Taiwan perspective of Taiwan history differed significantly from the China perspective familiar to most Mainlanders and shattered some of their deep beliefs. The crisis was resolved by a few revisions to the texts.

Rosemary Haddon examines the writings of Zhu Tianxin, a female Mainlander writer, and her feelings of homelessness in democratizing, "Taiwanizing", Taiwan. Her works display a shift from believing in to rejecting the China-centered perspective and Mainlander superiority over the Taiwanese, partly because of declines in Taiwan's fortunes in the foreign arena during the 1970s and 1980s, and partly because she came to reject the sort of Mainlanders she grew up with in a village of Mainlander soldiers and their dependents. Zhu's novella, Gudu (Ancient Capital), the focus of Haddon's piece, takes another turn, assailing what she regards as the politically correct memory of Taiwan's past because her own memories lie outside it and, she claims, are rejected by it.

A-Chin Hsiau's chapter explains why debates in xiangtu literature have been so fierce. One reason is that xiangtu has become embroiled in the debate over literary history, especially whether it is part of the Chinese literary tradition or whether it is "de-Sinified" and represents a new, non-Chinese form. Is it a local part of the struggle by Chinese to decolonize and de-imperialize China, or is it part of the struggle by Taiwanese to re-decolonize Taiwan, and rediscover their Taiwanese roots after a generation of re-Sinification by the émigré KMT regime?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?